ll~Akhand Bharat Nirman ke Sainik~ll (Strictly Invites Only) - Page 4

I wish Contiloe had never taken up the project.The cast was brilliant but they were definitely in the wrong hands.

Originally posted by: ---Andromeda---

I wish Contiloe had never taken up the project.The cast was brilliant but they were definitely in the wrong hands.

Sone ke chidiya ko kachre ka dibba bana diya Contiloe ne ...True I would have preferred some other PH...
Edited by Courageous_Leo - 7 years ago

Originally posted by: Courageous_Leo

Sone ke chidiya ko kachre ka dibba bana diya Contiloe ne ...True I would have preferred some other PH...

Sach main!!! You know there was some sort of a conflict between Swastik and Contiloe for making a show on Ashoka and Swastik gave in to Contiloe.

Originally posted by: ---Andromeda---

Sach main!!! You know there was some sort of a conflict between Swastik and Contiloe for making a show on Ashoka and Swastik gave in to Contiloe.

Now I really wish that Swastik had made Ashoka.Because even if they would have distorted it they wouldn't have made it a bore fest like Contiloe did.

But they would not have taken Sid...And that was big loss to the viewers...Other than the awesum actors, the show had nothing. esp in terms of story. But its really sad to see such a great show to become a joke. And that too a show in the name of Ashoka- one of the great emperors world has ever seen

Originally posted by: Courageous_Leo

But they would not have taken Sid...And that was big loss to the viewers...Other than the awesum actors, the show had nothing. esp in terms of story. But its really sad to see such a great show to become a joke. And that too a show in the name of Ashoka- one of the great emperors world has ever seen

Hmmm!! That's true.They wouldn't have taken Sid.Sid was truly the greatest asset to CAS just like Faisal was to MP.

And another thing which I don't like about the historicals nowadays is that the protagonist is always shown as the noble hero who is pitched against the big,bad world.Why is it necessary for them to be demigods?? Why can't they be shown as they really were?? As human beings.

For me Ashok will always be Sid. Till the young Ashok I enjoyed the show. Sid's last episode as Ashok even then his anger and disappointment was the best thing about the show. The leap ruined everything. Honestly the leap supposed to bring freshness to the story. Show the real Ashok, the Samrat. But did the leap bring anything like that ? So better they never showed the leap. 

Originally posted by: MuguetDScorpion

For me Ashok will always be Sid. Till the young Ashok I enjoyed the show. Sid's last episode as Ashok even then his anger and disappointment was the best thing about the show. The leap ruined everything. Honestly the leap supposed to bring freshness to the story. Show the real Ashok, the Samrat. But did the leap bring anything like that ? So better they never showed the leap. 

Sid was truly the heart and soul of the show.His performance was phenomenal.

Originally posted by: ---Andromeda---

Sid was truly the heart and soul of the show.His performance was phenomenal.

But when the leap came,I will blame the storyline and shoddy writing for it.As you said the leap was supposed to bring freshness but it never did.Ashok never became Chand and the rest was all Qwack,Qwack,Qwack

I have another theory.