Originally posted by: Piyatrix
The only thing going against Lagaan was its length ( 3 hrs) and time zone(period film). Other then that it had everything needed for a film to succeed, it had cricket ( most popular sport in the country), story of an underdog, patriotic theme and happy ending. So I wont agree that it was out of the mill or totally different but yes it was a very well made film no 2 ways about it.
Again not true at all. Do you know how many people rejected it and how many people said it will be a flop. Nobody believed that it will be anything more than a washout. Lagaan smashed the most BW myths/stereotypes. Cant remember any-another movie doing so.
Watch Chale Chalo; a small movie based on its making to get the idea just how difficult it was.Naming some of the negatives;- It was a period movie.
- It had off-beat songs.
- A hero in a Dhoti and a dark heroine. A big no, no at the time.
- It was three hours long.
- It was made on cricket. How many movie have been made or cricket and how many of them are successful?? Cricket was the last subject to make a movie on in those days.
- It was shot in Bhuj. A barren waste-land.
- And you had the actors speaking a different language altogether. Couple that with the British actors speaking English and heavily accented Hindi.
Nobody gave it a chance as a standalone movie let alone as a clash with another biggie. Yet/ it clashed with Gaddar; one of biggest hits of all time and emerged as a huge success.
comment:
p_commentcount