Posted:
Kamal's first statement to the police was that Salman was driving. He changed it later. Why would his first instinct be to try to protect a driver instead of his powerful friend Salman? If the driver was really driving, then why did he testify now, 13 years later? Why not tell the 'truth' and save his boss from the beginning only? Salman is so kind-hearted that he was willing to put his reputation, peace of mind, and potential jail time on the line for a driver? Salman is pleading not guilty, of course he will say he wasn't driving, but why not get the driver to testify earlier?
What would or what did Patil gain from testifying against Salman? Poverty, no peace, and death. If he had said driver was driving, he would have continued to work for Sallu and lived a good life probably. It's a big price to pay for 2 mins of fame. So why would he choose to testify against Salman?
In my mind, there is no doubt whatsover that Salman did it. I find his actions after that even more despicable.
comment:
p_commentcount