Originally posted by _barbie
Originally posted by CaptainSpark
Arre I dont uderstand this logic... What d hell.. Chanakya is searching around for an able heir for the throne... Why cant he train the princes in the palace! I dont believ in his stupid logics like he has this blood and he had uski maa ki mahatyakangsha..
If nto Sushim Siamak, Draupad there are so many people! (Bindu had many sons) Chanakya is goin around looking for heirs.
Wat if ashok wud not be there? wat wud he do?? And how does he know Ashok is flawless (as he decribed yuvraj ko yeh hona chaiye n all)
This show is showing it like this, Chanakya had no role in Ashoka's reign. It was Radhagupt
But sicne this show is doing it like this why cant they have logic? WTH? Baki sbake liye sab bhala aur Sushim ke liye nahi.
yaar not just coz wat he is doing with sushim , but i m observing something very weird in chanakya's behavior for quite some time
attitude towards sushim is just the recent addition
i knw this is not the correct thread to discuss details about him , i thought of making a topic on it, but given how lazy the the forum is, i dint and now that i m a known sushim admirer , i thought ppl will think i m saying all this out of frustration we are discussing it in accordance to Sushim and we are talking about the SHOW's portrayal of Chanakya. I totally support the real Chanakya as i know he is not a lobbyist so no worries discuss him
first of all , as per my understanding he holds no formal position in royal court. he is supposed to act only as a guardian. so him influencing bindu to act in a certain manner is understandable , but deeds like stopping the coronation shud b regarded unconstitutional interference in proceeding of royal court.LOL. Ok but even if we accept his opinion is taken as regard.. lets see it this way that he just wanted to say to Samrat its not rght.. okay his opinion. But what I dont understand is what is wrong in him becoming the Yuvraj. I think it is radhagupt who was pro ashoka and not chanakya. I am afraid he wasnt in the condition to go here and there saying this and that. He was quite old when he brought Chandragupt.
about your point, yes yaar
for last few days he is going on n on how siamak cant b king becos he has khorasani blood... WTH . so what he hs khorasani blood, he is a mauryan too . and if he had that much objection about mixing of blood , then why did he allow the marraige to take place ? same discriminaion from his side for justin and helena too... that their origins are greek. suppose agar helena negative character na hoti , toh ye nainsaafi hoti na unke aur justin k saath! aise discrimination agar ho, toh +ve character bhi - ve ban jaye...Dear Helena is one of the most interesting love stories of CGM! I read about it in the net and I dont think she was liek this. Most importantly ashokavadhana does not refer to her like this.. not any account of Bindusar. This is totally wrong... and Justin is anyways the eldest. I dont understand... history has the example of such a HUGE war just because of dis...(Kurukshetra!) .. having the legal ELDEST in the throne. I dont know why justin is not king. WTH! Khorassani khun so what? Chanakya's greatest quote is "A man is known for his deeds, not his birth." IDK what these makers plan...
about sushim , this is wat he said in friday's episode ------>
" Sushim ne jis prakar se shama maangi, uss balak ke netro me vishaili rajniti ki kutilta pratyaksh dekhi maine. Ek uttejit balak ko vikrit mansikta se grath yuvak k roop mein dekha maine usse... issliye maine usse aisa dand diya hai, jo dand uski pariksha lega aur iss pariksha me uska dhong sabke samaksh prakat ho jayega
Ashok k liye jo yojna maine banayi hai, uske liye ye anivarya hai"
this is an ACHARYA (GURU) talking, i m stunned. matlab being a teacher , a guardian u give an assignment to ur pupil and pray that they fail to complete it
to reiterate ur point , why didnt he train the existing rajkumars accordingly on the first place
now that the bus has missed the stoppage , he is calling my boy names DISGUSTING.
m sure the real one had no similarities in nature with this one , so that i can still say that i have regards for this historical character