For Hunting/Arms act case, He may go to jail. We have to wait to find out. There is no 2-Way here.
Salman and bad luck go together.
For 2002 hit and run case, No. If the prosecutiom had proof to his guilt, this case would have never dragged so long. It's a Salman Khan case, not a common man case. Now I understand why he asked to received verdict of a common. But hey Salman, too late now. The media has left no stone in damaging you just to earn their bread and butter. Actually everyone has because again, you are Salman Khan.
Maybe Salman was driving, maybe he WASN'T. Why should I believe Patil and why shouldn't I believe Ashok ? Oh right, I should believe Patil because he said Salman was driving and later died from TB so he becomes Sachayi ka Angel and so Stupid Media will distribute his picture from his final days to trigger hatred for Salman. Sure. Doctors.
When Salman in 2002 claimed Ashok was driving, why didn't the law call for Ashok back in 2002, wouldn't all this be finished?
I don't understand what kind of case is this. All victims, eyewintnesses are suppose to be cross examined once their names have been mentioned in trial.
but here, Sessions Court chose who to examine and who to not examine.
:/
comment:
p_commentcount