Bollywood News, Bollywood Movies, Bollywood Chat

India-Forums

   
Bollywood News, Bollywood Movies, Bollywood Chat
Bollywood News, Bollywood Movies, Bollywood Chat

Defence Hammers Prosecution on May 8 2015 (Page 6)

_Darling_ IF-Sizzlerz
_Darling_
_Darling_

Joined: 18 June 2011
Posts: 11438

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 2:16am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Kareenafanatic

Originally posted by _Darling_

Originally posted by Kareenafanatic

Prosecution has to prove that Salman was driving, which it hasn't managed to as we saw during the HC appeal. There are too many loopholes for the Court to reach a proper verdict. Now, that is intriguing because the Sessions Court issued a 5-year sentence based on a case that is filled with loopholes in which the Prosecution itself hasn't been able to prove that Salman was driving. It's all sounding whimsical.

Whether Salman is guilty or not, court needs facts and statements that can be backed. In this case, there are none. I'm amazed how the Sessions Court even reached a judgment without reviewing every aspect of the case. The case is riddled with dead ends.

The confusing state of the case makes me think that we'll never see a proper verdict. Prosecution can't prove that Salman was driving and defense is just ripping apart everything the Prosecution states.

Salman being drunk doesn't matter if he's not driving, so that's a non-issue. If Amit Desai keeps up with his form, I won't be surprised if the case if dismissed due to lack of proof. It's only Salman's celebrity status that has dragged the case for so long. It's also that same status that's granting him bail.

The major case for Salman is the one of black buck/chinkara. That's in SC and doesn't have as many loopholes as the hit-and-run case.

1+++ I am shocked at how they gave 5 years as punishment without even proving if he was driving or not. Shocked All this time I thought he was alone in the car as I didn't know the rest of details and then thought may be only the driver was with him. So I thought he was lying when he said he wasn't driving. I just got to knew now so many ppl were in the car. Why haven't others, who were in the car, gotten cases against them because they were also in the car and some  were also accused of being driving? Is it because they aren't celebrities, so no one cares or because they weren't drunk? 
But this is insane. How Can court decide 5 years as punishment when there are so many contradictory statements over who was driving at the first place!! May be Salman was driving which I believe most likely he was, but we don't know for sure. And, it will be unfair to blame someone without any proof. 


It doesn't matter how drunk you are or what you're doing as long as you're not driving. Even if Salman was drunk as hell, if he was not driving - there is no case. And prosecution hasn't been able to prove that he was driving. Negligence from the Sessions Court has resulted in this verdict. I'm pretty sure - unless the Indian penal system is hellbent on making an example out of Salman - there will be no case because nothing can be proven here. Lack of evidence always favors the accused. Salman doesn't have to prove he's innocent. The prosecution has to prove that he was driving, hence, guilty.


Originally posted by MrsSalmanKhan

For black buck case, I think he will have to pay a fine only..
there were other actors involved too.. they just got away by paying fines. right? 





Nah. He's already been sentenced to 5 years by Rajasthan High Court for illegal Arms Act.

If the SC declares a verdict, Salman has nowhere to go now. He has to own up. I doubt the Prez would be involved. I think the SC will impose heavy fines on Salman and give him a sentence of 2 years. If they sentence him to 6 months, there will be severe backlash from the media. This upcoming May 28th hearing is more important for Salman than the hit-and-run case.

But why 5 years just for killing an animal? Confused

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

MainePyaarKiya

Kareenafanatic Goldie
Kareenafanatic
Kareenafanatic

Joined: 30 August 2012
Posts: 2058

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 2:27am | IP Logged
@ Darling

It's not just killing animals. First, he killed 2 chinkaras and a black buck. Both endangered species, yet if that were the only offense, they'd have charged him for a year or would have resolved the issue through fines and community service.

But the main case is of illegal Arms. The licence of Salman's arms had expired when he hunted down those creatures. Salman claims that he had applied for an extension of his licence and it was just about to arrive. Courts believe he had illegals arms in his possession.

He was sentenced for 5 years because of those illegal arms, according to the Court. He received an additional 1 year sentence for killing of those animals. The maximum sentence in illegal arms act is 7 years. 5 is again too harsh. I can see it coming down, but I think Salman will have to go to jail this time.

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

_Darling_MainePyaarKiya

_Darling_ IF-Sizzlerz
_Darling_
_Darling_

Joined: 18 June 2011
Posts: 11438

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 2:31am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Kareenafanatic

@ Darling

It's not just killing animals. First, he killed 2 chinkaras and a black buck. Both endangered species, yet if that were the only offense, they'd have charged him for a year or would have resolved the issue through fines and community service.

But the main case is of illegal Arms. The licence of Salman's arms had expired when he hunted down those creatures. Salman claims that he had applied for an extension of his licence and it was just about to arrive. Courts believe he had illegals arms in his possession.

He was sentenced for 5 years because of those illegal arms, according to the Court. He received an additional 1 year sentence for killing of those animals. The maximum sentence in illegal arms act is 7 years. 5 is again too harsh. I can see it coming down, but I think Salman will have to go to jail this time.

He has such a bad luck. Ouch

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

MainePyaarKiya

-Arsal- IF-Dazzler
-Arsal-
-Arsal-

Joined: 25 July 2014
Posts: 4690

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 2:34am | IP Logged
And guys Salve is his lawyer. So the bail and the stuff is his doing. Maybe Amit is on his team or something but Salve is definitely in charge.

He ain't charging close of 30 laks per day for nothing. Salve came on board the case when it moved to HC. He doesnt take cases in the session courts.

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

MainePyaarKiya

BhataktiJawani IF-Sizzlerz
BhataktiJawani
BhataktiJawani

Joined: 15 July 2013
Posts: 20019

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 5:48am | IP Logged
Salman has appointed an Excellent Lawyer ...Why the hell he appointed that dumb lawyer before

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

MainePyaarKiya

MainePyaarKiya IF-Stunnerz

Joined: 23 December 2011
Posts: 37768

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 8:32am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

_Darling_BhataktiJawani

Ramsha.. IF-Stunnerz
Ramsha..
Ramsha..

Joined: 10 November 2010
Posts: 25791

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 12:04pm | IP Logged
Five years is way too much for blackbuck case! 
Who is salman's lawyer for that case?


Edited by Saraa. - 10 May 2015 at 12:05pm

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

_Darling_MainePyaarKiya

_Darling_ IF-Sizzlerz
_Darling_
_Darling_

Joined: 18 June 2011
Posts: 11438

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 1:00pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Saraa.

Five years is way too much for blackbuck case! 
Who is salman's lawyer for that case?

Sorry to say, but 5 years for Blackbuck is the biggest joke. I really don't get at how countries laws aren't strict over rapists, murderers, pedophiles, illegal drug trafficking, etc who deserve death penalty, IMO. But they are always strict in Other light cases like Blackbuck, etc. 

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

Ramsha..MainePyaarKiya

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
Salman Drunk @ Time of Accident: Prosecution

2 3 4

Author: Cutiepie Rani   Replies: 25   Views: 1884

Cutiepie Rani 25 1884 09 April 2015 at 1:35pm by MainePyaarKiya
SALMAN'S driver a liar, says prosecution

2 3

Author: Thrasher   Replies: 23   Views: 1962

Thrasher 23 1962 06 April 2015 at 9:10pm by AllBlacks1
Prosecution rejects Salman's driver's version

2

Author: HarveySpecter   Replies: 15   Views: 1373

HarveySpecter 15 1373 02 April 2015 at 10:09am by MainePyaarKiya
The sexist defence of Suraj: Let's scapegoat Jiah

2

Author: chimchimcher-ee   Replies: 12   Views: 1713

chimchimcher-ee 12 1713 14 June 2013 at 11:49am by SRK-BEBO
Shilpa Shetty At 'DNA Women's Self Defence Camp' D

Author: soroshkhan   Replies: 0   Views: 364

soroshkhan 0 364 15 January 2013 at 12:31pm by soroshkhan

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Bollywood News, Bollywood Movies, Bollywood Chat Topic Index

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index