Bollywood News, Bollywood Movies, Bollywood Chat

India-Forums

   
Bollywood News, Bollywood Movies, Bollywood Chat
Bollywood News, Bollywood Movies, Bollywood Chat

Defence Hammers Prosecution on May 8 2015 (Page 4)

Ramsha.. IF-Stunnerz
Ramsha..
Ramsha..

Joined: 10 November 2010
Posts: 25791

Posted: 09 May 2015 at 11:32pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by _Darling_

Originally posted by Saraa.

Originally posted by _Darling_

If Salman already said so many times that his driver was driving, then why are people reacting and saying as if he just said it now his driver was driving?  Clearly he had said the same since 2002, not just now. He didn't change the statement all of the sudden to blame it on his driver. 
So Both Salman and his driver are saying the driver was driving the car. 

Whole Patil said Salman was driving, but Kamal says Salman was driving then he says he wasn't driving. 

What a confusion and kichidI! All of them cant say one same statement, instead are saying their own versions of it. ConfusedSilly 

May be when it happened, they all decided to keep giving contradictory statements. So this way no one will get caught, and the court wont be able to arrest anyone. People will just remain confused. Just a possibility lol. 

So Salman never changed his statement. So its both salman and driver that said driver was driving then why didnt court take their statements into consideration esp the driver? thats so freaking confusing.

Honestly this case is confusing yet weak! I wonder what went wrong with old salman lawyer. Amit Desai will easily win this case

Yeah, Salman never changed his statement If he always said it was driver, and driver never said against with it. 

Salman was drunk, so I get it. But what happened to the rest? The way they have been giving contradicting statements is as if they all were drunk too!! I tried to find details about this case online, but all it shows Salman hit and run case and how he was driving, etc. It never talks about that other were in the car too and how they've been also accused of driving, not just Salman. In fact, I didnt even so many were with in the car till now because the way media has always made it as if Salman was alone and was driving. So I don't get why others didn't get any case against them , and it's only Salman who has the case against him just because he was drunk as per one cop, not because they've proven he was driving. 
Maybe all of them were drunk or maybe a conspiracy. There can be many possibilities. I believe salman was drunk but maybe he wasn't driving. Gosh this case will eat my brain LOL

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

_Darling_

_Darling_ IF-Sizzlerz
_Darling_
_Darling_

Joined: 18 June 2011
Posts: 11438

Posted: 09 May 2015 at 11:41pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Saraa.

Originally posted by _Darling_

Originally posted by Saraa.

Originally posted by _Darling_

If Salman already said so many times that his driver was driving, then why are people reacting and saying as if he just said it now his driver was driving?  Clearly he had said the same since 2002, not just now. He didn't change the statement all of the sudden to blame it on his driver. 
So Both Salman and his driver are saying the driver was driving the car. 

Whole Patil said Salman was driving, but Kamal says Salman was driving then he says he wasn't driving. 

What a confusion and kichidI! All of them cant say one same statement, instead are saying their own versions of it. ConfusedSilly 

May be when it happened, they all decided to keep giving contradictory statements. So this way no one will get caught, and the court wont be able to arrest anyone. People will just remain confused. Just a possibility lol. 

So Salman never changed his statement. So its both salman and driver that said driver was driving then why didnt court take their statements into consideration esp the driver? thats so freaking confusing.

Honestly this case is confusing yet weak! I wonder what went wrong with old salman lawyer. Amit Desai will easily win this case

Yeah, Salman never changed his statement If he always said it was driver, and driver never said against with it. 

Salman was drunk, so I get it. But what happened to the rest? The way they have been giving contradicting statements is as if they all were drunk too!! I tried to find details about this case online, but all it shows Salman hit and run case and how he was driving, etc. It never talks about that other were in the car too and how they've been also accused of driving, not just Salman. In fact, I didnt even so many were with in the car till now because the way media has always made it as if Salman was alone and was driving. So I don't get why others didn't get any case against them , and it's only Salman who has the case against him just because he was drunk as per one cop, not because they've proven he was driving. 
Maybe all of them were drunk or maybe a conspiracy. There can be many possibilities. I believe salman was drunk but maybe he wasn't driving. Gosh this case will eat my brain LOL

I did consider that may be Salman isn't lying and may be we all are misunderstanding him, but then I thought that's impossible. So I didn't think much and thought it was stupid theory, but that time I didn't so many were with him in the car as well. Neither did I know all their contradictory statements and others were also being alleged as driving the car even though no one else had case against them except Salman. But now that I know all these details, I am for sure considering my theory. It can be possible he wasn't actually driving after all. May he is accused the most as being the driving one that night as he was the one drunk, so everyone thought only drunk perdon can cause accident. Also, because he was celebrity, so more hype And got  the most accused. He got even more accused as people don't normally leave more powerful person and accuse them the most while turning blind eye to the rest of the alleged ones just because they weren't as rich as Salman. But then again it can be possible. I am not sure. Let's see what's the result of this case, but the case is very confusing so there can be many possibilities. 

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

nana5

Kareenafanatic Goldie
Kareenafanatic
Kareenafanatic

Joined: 30 August 2012
Posts: 2058

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 1:04am | IP Logged
Prosecution has to prove that Salman was driving, which it hasn't managed to as we saw during the HC appeal. There are too many loopholes for the Court to reach a proper verdict. Now, that is intriguing because the Sessions Court issued a 5-year sentence based on a case that is filled with loopholes in which the Prosecution itself hasn't been able to prove that Salman was driving. It's all sounding whimsical.

Whether Salman is guilty or not, court needs facts and statements that can be backed. In this case, there are none. I'm amazed how the Sessions Court even reached a judgment without reviewing every aspect of the case. The case is riddled with dead ends.

The confusing state of the case makes me think that we'll never see a proper verdict. Prosecution can't prove that Salman was driving and defense is just ripping apart everything the Prosecution states.

Salman being drunk doesn't matter if he's not driving, so that's a non-issue. If Amit Desai keeps up with his form, I won't be surprised if the case if dismissed due to lack of proof. It's only Salman's celebrity status that has dragged the case for so long. It's also that same status that's granting him bail.

The major case for Salman is the one of black buck/chinkara. That's in SC and doesn't have as many loopholes as the hit-and-run case.

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

nana5_Darling_Ramsha..

MainePyaarKiya IF-Stunnerz

Joined: 23 December 2011
Posts: 37768

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 1:10am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

The following 4 member(s) liked the above post:

nana5_Darling_BhataktiJawaniRamsha..

_Darling_ IF-Sizzlerz
_Darling_
_Darling_

Joined: 18 June 2011
Posts: 11438

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 1:13am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Kareenafanatic

Prosecution has to prove that Salman was driving, which it hasn't managed to as we saw during the HC appeal. There are too many loopholes for the Court to reach a proper verdict. Now, that is intriguing because the Sessions Court issued a 5-year sentence based on a case that is filled with loopholes in which the Prosecution itself hasn't been able to prove that Salman was driving. It's all sounding whimsical.

Whether Salman is guilty or not, court needs facts and statements that can be backed. In this case, there are none. I'm amazed how the Sessions Court even reached a judgment without reviewing every aspect of the case. The case is riddled with dead ends.

The confusing state of the case makes me think that we'll never see a proper verdict. Prosecution can't prove that Salman was driving and defense is just ripping apart everything the Prosecution states.

Salman being drunk doesn't matter if he's not driving, so that's a non-issue. If Amit Desai keeps up with his form, I won't be surprised if the case if dismissed due to lack of proof. It's only Salman's celebrity status that has dragged the case for so long. It's also that same status that's granting him bail.

The major case for Salman is the one of black buck/chinkara. That's in SC and doesn't have as many loopholes as the hit-and-run case.

1+++ I am shocked at how they gave 5 years as punishment without even proving if he was driving or not. Shocked All this time I thought he was alone in the car as I didn't know the rest of details and then thought may be only the driver was with him. So I thought he was lying when he said he wasn't driving. I just got to knew now so many ppl were in the car. Why haven't others, who were in the car, gotten cases against them because they were also in the car and some  were also accused of being driving? Is it because they aren't celebrities, so no one cares or because they weren't drunk? 
But this is insane. How Can court decide 5 years as punishment when there are so many contradictory statements over who was driving at the first place!! May be Salman was driving which I believe most likely he was, but we don't know for sure. And, it will be unfair to blame someone without any proof. 


Edited by _Darling_ - 10 May 2015 at 1:27am

The following 3 member(s) liked the above post:

nana5Ramsha..MainePyaarKiya

MainePyaarKiya IF-Stunnerz

Joined: 23 December 2011
Posts: 37768

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 1:20am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.
MainePyaarKiya IF-Stunnerz

Joined: 23 December 2011
Posts: 37768

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 1:23am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

_Darling_Ramsha..

_Darling_ IF-Sizzlerz
_Darling_
_Darling_

Joined: 18 June 2011
Posts: 11438

Posted: 10 May 2015 at 1:24am | IP Logged
Originally posted by MrsSalmanKhan

Originally posted by _Darling_

If Salman already said so many times that his driver was driving, then why are people reacting and saying as if he just said it now his driver was driving?  Clearly he had said the same since 2002, not just now. He didn't change the statement all of the sudden to blame it on his driver. 
So Both Salman and his driver are saying the driver was driving the car. 


Exactly. I can't believe all the backlash that day... Times of India reported in 2002 Salman mentioned Singh was driving. 

He didn't change his statement  just now.  He said this 13 years ago and ashok was never called to record statement back then. obviously prosecution was playing his own game. 





People seriously seem blind here. I too criticized him that day when he said his driver was driving because I thought it was his first time saying and thought he was alone in the car. But I am sure many people here knew the details and knew he had said that before as well, then I don't get why they were bashing him! Confused

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

Ramsha..MainePyaarKiya

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
Salman Drunk @ Time of Accident: Prosecution

2 3 4

Author: Cutiepie Rani   Replies: 25   Views: 1884

Cutiepie Rani 25 1884 09 April 2015 at 1:35pm by MainePyaarKiya
SALMAN'S driver a liar, says prosecution

2 3

Author: Thrasher   Replies: 23   Views: 1962

Thrasher 23 1962 06 April 2015 at 9:10pm by AllBlacks1
Prosecution rejects Salman's driver's version

2

Author: HarveySpecter   Replies: 15   Views: 1373

HarveySpecter 15 1373 02 April 2015 at 10:09am by MainePyaarKiya
The sexist defence of Suraj: Let's scapegoat Jiah

2

Author: chimchimcher-ee   Replies: 12   Views: 1713

chimchimcher-ee 12 1713 14 June 2013 at 11:49am by SRK-BEBO
Shilpa Shetty At 'DNA Women's Self Defence Camp' D

Author: soroshkhan   Replies: 0   Views: 364

soroshkhan 0 364 15 January 2013 at 12:31pm by soroshkhan

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Bollywood News, Bollywood Movies, Bollywood Chat Topic Index

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index