Is this the FACE of a REMORSEFUL Man? - Page 10

So now people will use his face to judge whether or not he is remorseful or not?

And does it matter if he is remorseful or not? If he makes a public apology, all the people who dislike him will say that it is too late for an apology. If he doesn't apologize publicly (which he won't), then he will be admonished for not doing so. 

That's a big issue with the people in this country. Using such serious cases to carry out their personal agendas.

Originally posted by: TheBoss

The whole thing was a joke, they take people for idiots. This was a carefully orchastrated scheme. Find him guilty (appease the naysayers) and then grant him bail and (appease the rich and mighty). In this way the Government has tried to show itself that it HAS done something. And as for him having some charity does not mean you walk scott free from your crimes with no repercussions. By effectively quashing his sentence the Government has now officially given him a license to kill and validated so basically we have a 50 year old, steroid abusing women beating murderer one the lose so hope to god you don't cross into him on some street.

Originally posted by: blue-ice

THIS!!!

Apart from the use of murderer for him...i agree with everything else...how come Salve who charges 30 lakhs per day sounded like a dumb idiot in the lower court and did not raise all the smart questions about the 4th person in the lower court...How come he brought all that up in High court? its all scripted...an eye wash...nothing else...He will in all probability be exonerated of all charges from HC unless something comes up...like someone rising from the dead..

and also regarding people saying it was just an accident...no it was not...it was manslaughter...When u get in the car which u r not even supposed to drive(no valid license) and then u are drunk on top of that...u know very well that u MIGHT kill urself or someone else...and knowing all this u still drive recklessly then its NOT an accident...and for those numbnuts who argue that footpath is not for sleeping...then those morons need to know that ...what if someone was standing on the footpath waiting for a bus or a cab or was just walking...what then?? When a person who is not supposed to drive is driving anything can happen...what if he had hit a car with a family in it...Its like giving a loaded gun to a child to play...and the child goes and kills someone...would that be an accident? Shouldn't the moron have known that a loaded gun is not for a child to play with...it can kill...do u think tht they can get away by saying...oh but I didn't want to kill someone..

Originally posted by: pallavi25

Please talk in proper context, I didnt use the word drool first, Mrs. Sallu Khan did...I said fantasize...its MY OPINION and Im entitled to it just as u are entitled to ur opinion...I really think and feel its rather sick if a teenager fantasizes abt a 50 yr old actor...[/DIV]

I was talking in general terms but Mrs Khan took it personally (and shes not even a teenager) ...what can I do abt that?😕

Lots of Sallu fans have been spouting nonsense like blaming the footpath dwellers, asking why they sleep on the "road" ...so I guess both the road and footpath belong to a drunken Sallu to drive...

Now THAT is really offensive!

We are not judging, we are only wondering how on earth people can support a criminal who has done a string of crimes like hunting protected wildlife, beating up his girlfriends and the worst ones, running over homeless people on the footpath and bullying the witness to an early death!

How can one support a criminal just because hes a movie star?😕

Oh, okay
I'm sorry I used "drooling" instead

Let me try this again.
No one has the right to judge people, if one wants to fantasize about 50 or 70 years old man..
It's their choice, neither you nor anyone else gets to judge that..
You don't understand how teenagers can fantasize about old man?? Understandable
Does that give the right to point fingers?? No

And yes I wasn't talking about one person in particular..
You said it in general so am I.

Coming to your false accusations..
Only one fan said something like this, so stop going arnd telling something completely wrong
Not a lot of Salman fans go arnd blaming the victim.

And last but not the least..
You don't understand how people can like criminal like Salman Khan..
It's not for you to understand, I don't care what you think of him..
You don't like him?? Fine
Just stop loosing your sleep over to why his fans like him..
It's not something that needs understanding or approval..
They like him, they like him...end of the story

Stop judging people

Originally posted by: pallavi25

Please talk in proper context, I didnt use the word drool first, Mrs. Sallu Khan did...I said fantasize...its MY OPINION and Im entitled to it just as u are entitled to ur opinion...I really think and feel its rather sick if a teenager fantasizes abt a 50 yr old actor...

I was talking in general terms but Mrs Khan took it personally (and shes not even a teenager) ...what can I do abt that? 😕

Lots of Sallu fans have been spouting nonsense like blaming the footpath dwellers, asking why they sleep on the "road" ...so I guess both the road and footpath belong to a drunken Sallu to drive...

 Now THAT is really offensive! 

We are not judging, we are only wondering how on earth people can support a criminal who has done a string of crimes like hunting protected wildlife, beating up his girlfriends and the worst ones, running over homeless people on the footpath and bullying the witness to an early death! 

How can one support a criminal just because hes a movie star? 😕

Edited by _Darling_ - 8 years ago

Originally posted by: -Arsal-

alve didnt take the case in session court. He came on board two days ago.

In the session court both prosecution and defense were equally dumb. Still wonder how Salman got sentenced in the first place.

The case was so weak that it fell apart on the first point in HC.