if anandi brought mannu2 ganga then does it mean Aji has more rites on him than her bio mother or his foster father who r doing all 4 their son??😕Originally posted by: AdorableAnusha
Lol i simply cannot understand people 's amazing comparisons they are telling Anandi brought mannu to Ganga from Ratan Now she wants to help Ratan so she wants to take Mannu to him and Ganga should have no objections Wow Is Mannu Anandi's private property ?
Ganga never asked her to help her She brought Mannu to him on her ownNow if wants to take Mannu to same man should not she have asked Ganga before ?or Mannu is personal property she can take him to Ratan without asking Ganga even for once?
esha tho i a gree wid u but not on last para. bcoz its not true.Originally posted by: Missesha
In BV history, the story is always twisted to make one person look outright villian and the other person as 'the bechara/ bechari' suffering all the emotional atyachar.
There are two situations here:Anandi should not have made any promise to Ratan singh, as it was not her call to do so. She is wrong here. Both DS and J should have pointed that out to her. Anandi should have accepted her mistake and left it at that.On the other hand, J and DS should have stepped up and told Ganga, that regardless of Anandi's promise or not, the underlying question is "doesn't Ratan Singh have a right to see his Son, and doesn't Mannu have a right to know about his biological parents?"They should have slowly drilled sense in Ganga, and got her to agree. But here both J and Dsa have taken a back seat.And now finally, Anandi decides to make it a mission to convince Ganga? Why? Why can't she leave Ganga alone? Why interfere in Ganga's life, just because she made a promise to a dying man and now wants to fulfill it at any cost?Why can't she just realise her folly, and leave things to JaGan?On one hand Anandi doesn't want to realise her folly, and on other hand she wants to make sure that she remains in good books of Ganga.So yeah, BV always have twisted ways of making one person look selfish and other one as 'bechara'. In this case Anandi is the trouble causer but will be seen as the poor soul and Ganga who is fairly wrong will be completely painted black.In a way, it is good that Ganga is getting to taste her own medicine, when she was trying to play the 'poor soul' during Jagya-Ganga-Sumitra fiasco. Ganga may now realise how a mother feels, when someone unnecessarily takes control of their child / son. Back then Ganga was the trouble causer but Sumitra was painted black.
comment:
p_commentcount