Anandi had no right to promise Ratan without consulting Ganga-Jagya.If writers show that Anandi has no idea about Mannu not knowing his father then it will be a blunder.She saw Shiv's condition when he got to know the truth and if I am not wrong she was hiding it from him as she was not sure and also because she didn't want to hurt him.But then Shiv got the hint and she had to reveal.So same is Mannu's condition.Mannu is in an age where he is neither a baby nor an adult so its very risky yet she confidently promised and then casually said what one should do for a dying person.Is the whole thing so easy!You can do whatever u think is right but there is the risk of Mannu getting to know the truth.The dialogues were absurd and went over my head.
And then Ganga.She has turned into one complete different personality,anyways nothing new.She bashed Jagya for wanting to save Mannu from future heartbreaks.Though Ratan raped her,beat her,almost killed her and one should never forgive the rapist,murderer but before leap she already forgave him and said she will bring Mannu to meet him.But now all of a sudden she hates him!Says she will not think much about a dying person!Are u serious.She was all OK with them and now she says doesn't want to give into their behkawa!Ya,we understand people changes and turns into one different person like Sriti turned into Sargun and Sargun turned into Aasiya.
And the most awaited part of the century Anandi vs Ganga happens.Thanks cvs.
But then I am glad that the writers yet didn't choose a side.They showed both right and both wrong but the sad part is that Ganga not ready to fulfil the wish of the person who saved Mannu is not at all good.That is not what she used to be.
comment:
p_commentcount