Debate Mansion

India-Forums

   
Debate Mansion
Debate Mansion

Amartya Sen phony

Druids Senior Member
Druids
Druids

Joined: 22 March 2015
Posts: 351

Posted: 02 May 2015 at 4:22pm | IP Logged
There is a school of thought in India now inhabited by people like that idiot Suhel Seth who say that British rule was good for India because it gave us railways and roads. Of course overlooking the fact that this was done to steal India's wealth.
Nobody talks about the deliberate famines. One such famine was in 1943 which was whitewashed by that sucker Amartya Sen for which he won the Nobel Prize. 

Bengal, that land of plenty where abundant fish is found int the clear ponds and endowed with fertile lands, saw 5.2 million of its citizenry starve to death. 

And all this only because Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose had formed the INA after being sidelined in the INC. 

Winston Churchill was a manic depressive, prone to mood swings and he was drunk throughout the day. 


He was a vindictive man, rather a diabolical person clinically. Just because the Bengalis supported Netaji who was close to the Japanese at the time, this ruthless man too great pains to starve Bengal which was connected to the rest of India by rail, roads, aircraft and ships. 

The British secretly confiscated every single boat, every single vehicle, including -- hold your breath-- bullock carts. 

Why isn't this holocaust ever mentioned? Do Indian lives not count?

qwertyesque IF-Rockerz
qwertyesque
qwertyesque

Joined: 03 December 2006
Posts: 6578

Posted: 02 May 2015 at 8:44pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Druids

There is a school of thought in India now inhabited by people like that idiot Suhel Seth who say that British rule was good for India because it gave us railways and roads. Of course overlooking the fact that this was done to steal India's wealth.
Nobody talks about the deliberate famines. One such famine was in 1943 which was whitewashed by that sucker Amartya Sen for which he won the Nobel Prize. 

Bengal, that land of plenty where abundant fish is found int the clear ponds and endowed with fertile lands, saw 5.2 million of its citizenry starve to death. 

And all this only because Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose had formed the INA after being sidelined in the INC. 

Winston Churchill was a manic depressive, prone to mood swings and he was drunk throughout the day. 


He was a vindictive man, rather a diabolical person clinically. Just because the Bengalis supported Netaji who was close to the Japanese at the time, this ruthless man too great pains to starve Bengal which was connected to the rest of India by rail, roads, aircraft and ships. 

The British secretly confiscated every single boat, every single vehicle, including -- hold your breath-- bullock carts. 

Why isn't this holocaust ever mentioned? Do Indian lives not count?

Think about it.. if Brits were to rule.. they would make situation convenient for them wont they... Yes its true brits.. did make us look good...and gave us infrastructure...take for example hong kong.. china owns it today but has britain transformed that state?

.. asking for freedom is one thing.. managing it is another..we hardly had any capability to run a country ... does it mean I support british rule..not really but painting them as evil black is not right... in those days the western world was kind of ruthless.. brits did the jallianwala baug... germans destroyed much of london...wasnt there the saying all's fair in love and war...btw churchill was the one who brought brit back on its feet after the blitz... history is a a veri debatable subject.. there is no absolute truth.. just the narrators version... 
iMini IF-Sizzlerz
iMini
iMini

Joined: 10 April 2012
Posts: 21321

Posted: 03 May 2015 at 4:26am | IP Logged
Anyone who says British rule was good for India..are the most ignorant people living on this planet.

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

Druids9tanki

Druids Senior Member
Druids
Druids

Joined: 22 March 2015
Posts: 351

Posted: 03 May 2015 at 6:56am | IP Logged
Originally posted by qwertyesque

[QUOTE=Druids]them wont they... Yes its true brits.. did make us look good...and gave us infrastructure...take for example hong kong.. china owns it today but has britain transformed that state?

.. asking for freedom is one thing.. managing it is another..we hardly had any capability to run a country ... does it mean I support british rule..not really but painting them as evil black is not right... in those days the western world was kind of ruthless.. brits did the jallianwala baug... germans destroyed much of london...wasnt there the saying all's fair in love and war...btw churchill was the one who brought brit back on its feet after the blitz... history is a a veri debatable subject.. there is no absolute truth.. just the narrators version... 

Ah, I see. You know even EVR Periyar and BR Ambedkar often said publicly that British rule was better than Indian rule and Periyar shed copious tears when India became independent.

Of course Indians are so dumb right that they would be living naked in caves doing grunt grunt for language if it wasn't for the kind British. 

Why is it that computer science and maths department of any Ivy league university is full of Indians, Chinese and Koreans with only a sprinkling of others. 

Churchill was discarded even by the British people once the war was over. He came up in life not on merit but his mother Jenny Jerome's connections. Delivered in a toilet during a dance party by his promiscuous mother, he was ignored by both parents during childhood and grew up to into a manic depressive. 
This was the Englishman who ordered the carpet bombing of German city Dresden , a cultural saxon city with NIL military value.  
He killed 420000 civilians in an saturation bombing orgy  lasting 24 minutes"just before the 2nd World war got over.


qwertyesque IF-Rockerz
qwertyesque
qwertyesque

Joined: 03 December 2006
Posts: 6578

Posted: 03 May 2015 at 9:18am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Druids

Originally posted by qwertyesque

[QUOTE=Druids]them wont they... Yes its true brits.. did make us look good...and gave us infrastructure...take for example hong kong.. china owns it today but has britain transformed that state?

.. asking for freedom is one thing.. managing it is another..we hardly had any capability to run a country ... does it mean I support british rule..not really but painting them as evil black is not right... in those days the western world was kind of ruthless.. brits did the jallianwala baug... germans destroyed much of london...wasnt there the saying all's fair in love and war...btw churchill was the one who brought brit back on its feet after the blitz... history is a a veri debatable subject.. there is no absolute truth.. just the narrators version... 

Ah, I see. You know even EVR Periyar and BR Ambedkar often said publicly that British rule was better than Indian rule and Periyar shed copious tears when India became independent.

Of course Indians are so dumb right that they would be living naked in caves doing grunt grunt for language if it wasn't for the kind British. 

Why is it that computer science and maths department of any Ivy league university is full of Indians, Chinese and Koreans with only a sprinkling of others.  what precent of "indians" does this represent.?. btw this stereotype is not going to be around too long.. 

Churchill was discarded even by the British people once the war was over. He came up in life not on merit but his mother Jenny Jerome's connections. Delivered in a toilet during a dance party by his promiscuous mother, he was ignored by both parents during childhood and grew up to into a manic depressive. 
This was the Englishman who ordered the carpet bombing of German city Dresden , a cultural saxon city with NIL military value.  
He killed 420000 civilians in an saturation bombing orgy  lasting 24 minutes"just before the 2nd World war got over. So now we want to do a personal attack on birth and upbringing...etc.. he stayed as the leader btw which wouldnt be one of the toilet accidedents.. i never undermine successful people no matter what 



Brits used to wash the streets of mumbai evry morning then I was told... they brought in a lot of discipline.. which was alien to indians and which is so glaringly visible even today...we lack time management, originality and ability to think clearly which makes us more of followers than leaders... Many westen countries dont recognize us the way they recognize other nations/religions..how many times have sikhs been killed mistaken for muslims.. - how many times any muslims have been attcaked in the US  for what they did to US... do these manaics not know where the mosques are located? they fear hurting muslims can have their bldgs blown up.. but hurting indians.. leads to some peaceful protests.. and then its over...to get back to the point.. brits were lousy bas***ds and they were exploiting the nation.. but as  they did that .. they did a lot of good things.. and not just loot the country...establishing india as their colony also entailed getting the infrastructure to the higher standards...of a developed country maybe for their own ease of rule!!!
Druids Senior Member
Druids
Druids

Joined: 22 March 2015
Posts: 351

Posted: 03 May 2015 at 3:08pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by qwertyesque

Originally posted by Druids

Originally posted by qwertyesque

[QUOTE=Druids]t

what precent of "indians" does this represent.?. btw this stereotype is not going to be around too long.. 






Is this stereotype going to be around at least till Einstein is exposed in mainstream media as a shameless plagiarist.
qwertyesque IF-Rockerz
qwertyesque
qwertyesque

Joined: 03 December 2006
Posts: 6578

Posted: 03 May 2015 at 9:17pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Druids

Originally posted by qwertyesque

Originally posted by Druids

Originally posted by qwertyesque

[QUOTE=Druids]t

what precent of "indians" does this represent.?. btw this stereotype is not going to be around too long.. 






Is this stereotype going to be around at least till Einstein is exposed in mainstream media as a shameless plagiarist.

another conspiracy theory!!?LOL
Druids Senior Member
Druids
Druids

Joined: 22 March 2015
Posts: 351

Posted: 05 May 2015 at 6:12am | IP Logged
Oh boy. Ignorance truly is bliss for some people. 
Austrian physicist Friedrich Hasenhrl had published a paper on the topic in 1904 in the VERY SAME JOURNAL  Annalen der Physik , USING THE SAME EQUATION E=MC^2  in which Einstein would publish his plagiarized version in Sept 1905.  For his brilliant work in this area,  Hasenhrl had received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious Vienna Academy of Sciences.

The math equation and relationship of mass / energy was a simple deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell.   Scientists long understood that the mathematical relationship is expressed by the equation E=MC^2.

Pea brained Einstein could not do math to save his life. The whole world knows that Einstein married his first Serbian wife to do his Math. Einstein actually told his close friends and it is his own words. He ditched her when he got a man better than ( Marcel Grossman )  her to do his math.


Go to top

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

  • Please login to check your Last 10 Topics posted

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index