Originally posted by: kabeeraspeakingTabu was great in Haider but her performance or character wasn't carrying the movie alone...even though she possessed the advantage of an extremely complex and intriguing character on paper, her performance wasn't revolutionary. Rani as a character on paper was much more typical and could easily have been under or overdone, but it's Kangana's nuanced performance that brought the movie together convincingly all on its own and made quite a large impact, especially as a female-led project. It's quite obvious who deserves the performance award. Irrfan shouldn't whine on her behalf.
Originally posted by: OutsiderOne
Kangana only good in good script movie. Not like Tabu, shes good in all movie. She better than Karisma in HhSSH, Biwi No 1 and more. Biwi No 1 was bad script, but she overshadowed karisma in that movie.
Originally posted by: kabeeraspeaking
Sure, I also think that Tabu is a much better and seasoned actress. Unfortunately none of those movies you mentioned released in 2014, so they can't be considered in determining who gets the award for that year. Most awards (except for the lifetime achievement type) are supposed to be given out on comparison of the performances delivered within the same year. So it's about Tabu's Haider vs. Kangana's Queen or other actresses performances in 2014 here...your mileage may very well vary when it comes to that.
Originally posted by: OutsiderOne
Still Tabu is better in Haider.
Tabu always get bypassed
She was the herione of Haider not the namby pamby 5 min role wali Shraddha| topics | author | replies | views | reply |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fazgostoso | 39 | 1726 | ||
| oyebollywood | 13 | 851 | ||
| cougarTown | 10 | 575 | ||
| desigal90 | 4 | 431 | ||
| Maroonporsche | 126 | 7208 |
comment:
p_commentcount