Originally posted by: AnuMP
Amrita and Mamtha
I totally think she was forgiving and because of that I agree with AC's theory that she wanted the war to bring down the power structure. IMO, when we say that she wanted war for vengeance we minimize her as a human being. We assume that she cannot possibly have been thinking of something as lofty as Samaaj kalyan. I love that series man. Finally an MB book which treated Panchali as the hero as she was and not like a moony teenager or vengeful virago. Actually, Krishna the God who lived as Man, was also very good; though it was more of an emotional journey instead of a story.
Arijit bhai
I read that interview. Some people are just monsters.
Whether Draupadi was forgiving or not is quite a debatable topic...
The problem is that Draupadi had been afflicted with kind of miseries that are very difficult to forgive...
If we place ourselves in her place, can we ever forgive a dewar like Dushasen or someone like Keechak or Jaydrath?
Certainly not.
So, if seen that way, she had every right to not forgive...
But she wae wronged so many times, n she had to ask for justice so many times, that an unforgiving image of hers has been carved in the mindset of the people...
Does anyone ever say that Sita was unforgiving or vengeful?No.
I have very less knowledge of Ramayan, but from wat I know, at some point, even she wanted her husband to rescue her n punish her tormenter...Is it any different from wat Draupadi wanted?
It's just that Draupadi was attacked so many times...again n again, which led to Draupadi asking for justice again n again n thus it seems as if she was vengeful n bloodthirsty by nature...
As for her forgiving Ashwathama...I think that is one of the greatest acts of hers...Although his gem was taken away, his life was spared, n she eventually let go off her vow...After losing her father, brothers, sons n almost everyone dear to her, wat could she gain by getting Ashwathama killed? ðŸ˜
Edited by amritat - 9 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount