I wish you did not have to go, but I completely understand why you are frustrated with the show and wish to stop watching it.
A few weeks back, in this forum, I read a scathing analysis of Pragya's situation where the writer said that she was having the stockholm syndrome, where the victim bonds with her/his captor/torturer as a form of self prenservation. Was that you who did this analysis? Anyhow it was spot on, and it continues to be relevant to Prajna's situation.
I can appreciate that Pragya is grateful to Abhi for having saved the Kumkum hall and thereby the livelihood of her family; however, gratitude does not mean that one becomes a doormat and a handy punching bag for the immature husband with sadistic tendencies. Also, why does not Pragya communicate? Why could she not have shared with Abhi why she gave the wrong testimony that extended his stay behind bars? Further, while telling Abhi with a grin on her face that she had collected evidence that would free him, why could she not play the video clip she had made of the corporator? That would have convinced even the most hard hearted person of her intentions. However, all soaps appear to thrive on such contrived misunderstandings, conflict, and separation, with the villainous ones gaining the upper hand.
Why cant soap makers understand that relationships, and the stories they tell do not end with confession/consummation? In fact, they become more nuanced and complex with time. There are ways to show these adjustments that people have to make to live with one another.
I wrote that post about the Stockholm syndrome, glad you agree :) yes, she is still harboring the same symptoms, the malaise was very apparent today as she declared to self that whatever he does or says, her respect for him will always be on the uptick. Really? !!
comment:
p_commentcount