Originally posted by: TheepetronaussYes, that's an interesting question. Like, 10 years down the line even if I get married I wouldn't want to change my surname & stuff and infact many women in the present age don't change their surnames after marriage , forget adding their husband's name to their last name . But Anandi comes from a traditional and conservative background where it is expected that after marriage the husband's name gets attached to girl's name. So Anandi Khajaan Singh (father's name) becomes Anandi Shivraj Shekhar (husband's name)
i agree Though its a matter of personal choice but i think there is nothing conservative or backward if a woman changes her surname and takes on husband name All family having same surname make it more look like a family and for legal purposes it is helpful tooOriginally posted by: MisseshaI feel it would be good if a woman takes on her husband's surname. After all she is making a family with him and eventually their kids will take on the father's name as well, so why not all members of the family go by the same surname.
It will look more like a family instead of people having different surnames in the same household.Also for legal purposes, travel, visa etc it is better to change the surname and obtain the right recognition. Just a personal opinion.
Originally posted by: MisseshaI feel it would be good if a woman takes on her husband's surname. After all she is making a family with him and eventually their kids will take on the father's name as well, so why not all members of the family go by the same surname.
It will look more like a family instead of people having different surnames in the same household.Also for legal purposes, travel, visa etc it is better to change the surname and obtain the right recognition. Just a personal opinion.
comment:
p_commentcount