Posted: 08 January 2014 at 7:35am | IP Logged
Originally posted by ChuglkhorBander
Originally posted by meghasingh
What do you man by "beautiful"? Beautiful is not a scientific term, but just an idea. For an example, tanned women aren't considered beautiful in India(in most of the societies, leave that small percentage for the upper class or intellectuals), however in west, tanned skin is beautiful and sexy. Same way now a days its zero figure which is popular, but in victorian era women should had been rather healthy and heavy, also check out all the classical beauties, Greek godesses, they were quite bulky.
So what do you mean by "beautiful"?
ok but even those victorian era healthy heroines nobody calls them ugly in present age of size zero. Beautiful is beautiful anytime figure may be thin or big.
Lets not forget current Heroines have access to best quality makeup, costly cloths, army of consultants, cosmetic surgery help and on top better camera lighting technical effects which makes anybody look 100 times better. Even after having all that they still look worse then many girls we see in real life. what will happen if they did not have all the help, they will probably look hideous.
My guess is these big stars is all media hype and nothing else. TV shows and movies and newspaper articles have made average looking kareena katrina kajol and so many others into big stars. Any common girl can become star if they had so much money publicity and support, much better than these heroines.
I did asked for your idea of beautiful only. First tell me that, and then I'll reply you. And about makeup, accessories,stylist etc. keep them aside, tell me what normal beauties are. And if you said like normal people, then there are more beautiful, and worse looking girls too. And in normal life, to look at someone is different from a distance, and in movie stars' case its different, to see them from every angle. Trust me on this, even the most beautiful person, if you see them nude, you'll find one or another fault for sure.