Mythological Masti

India-Forums

   
Mythological Masti
Mythological Masti

20 Secrets of Ramayana that no one knows

Proud-India IF-Sizzlerz
Proud-India
Proud-India

Joined: 02 January 2013
Posts: 11651

Posted: 02 August 2013 at 1:44am | IP Logged

Content Removed

The following 6 member(s) liked the above post:

Stalwart.cherrycoollmanzilmukulSilverBellDamRyeongRamKiSeeta

Surya_krsnbhakt IF-Dazzler
Surya_krsnbhakt
Surya_krsnbhakt

Joined: 20 March 2013
Posts: 3069

Posted: 02 August 2013 at 7:02am | IP Logged
Thanks for sharing Manan!
We know some of these facts, but not all...

But as per my understanding, Dasaratha was 60 Thousand years when he did the Putrakameshti. It is said like that in Ramayana:


"Sixty thousand years have passed from my birth, oh! Vishvamitra, and this Rama is engendered at this age, that too with tribulations, hence taking Rama with you will be inappropriate of you." 




Edited by Surya_krsnbhakt - 02 August 2013 at 7:02am

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

Proud-IndiaRamKiSeeta

sherlock IF-Dazzler
sherlock
sherlock

Joined: 12 February 2010
Posts: 3581

Posted: 02 August 2013 at 7:07am | IP Logged
Arrr, well thanks for the post. Smile
But in subject, you said that these are secrets no one knows.Confused However, all are known. So...

Infact, there is a "Ramayan" currently on air on Zee TV in which again they have shown some incidents you mention, like Indra Dev giving kheer to Sitaji.


The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

Proud-IndiaRamKiSeeta

sherlock IF-Dazzler
sherlock
sherlock

Joined: 12 February 2010
Posts: 3581

Posted: 02 August 2013 at 7:12am | IP Logged
Also, you say that "as per Hindu religion, there are 33 crore Gods & Goddesses.

Well no, this is not what 'Hindu religion' says.
Hindu scriptures inform us that there are 33 crore devi/devtas.

And there is one Lord of all creation, both manifest and unmanifest, who contains infinite creations in Him. Needless to say that infinite creations will have inifinite devi/devtas, why only 33 crore??

The Devi or devta of Sanskrit is hugely different from the 'God' or 'Goddess' of English. 

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

Proud-IndiaRamKiSeeta

Surya_krsnbhakt IF-Dazzler
Surya_krsnbhakt
Surya_krsnbhakt

Joined: 20 March 2013
Posts: 3069

Posted: 02 August 2013 at 7:14am | IP Logged
Hey did you know in one of the versions Ravana is Sita's father?

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Proud-India

sherlock IF-Dazzler
sherlock
sherlock

Joined: 12 February 2010
Posts: 3581

Posted: 02 August 2013 at 7:21am | IP Logged
Originally posted by Surya_krsnbhakt

Hey did you know in one of the versions Ravana is Sita's father?

This 'story' has its roots in verse from the samhita part of Veds, which all Sanskrit scholars, since old times, have said, has been wrongly translated. 

But some people, in old times, for some ulterior motives, still decided to keep the wrong translation, and try make it a part of Ramayan.

I've seen that samhita verse, and so, if you can trust my opinion, this story is totally bogus, an utter fraud.   

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

Proud-IndiaRamKiSeeta

RamKiSeeta IF-Addictz
RamKiSeeta
RamKiSeeta

Joined: 20 August 2008
Posts: 59385

Posted: 02 August 2013 at 8:50am | IP Logged

Content Removed

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Proud-India

RamKiSeeta IF-Addictz
RamKiSeeta
RamKiSeeta

Joined: 20 August 2008
Posts: 59385

Posted: 02 August 2013 at 8:54am | IP Logged
Originally posted by sherlock

Originally posted by Surya_krsnbhakt

Hey did you know in one of the versions Ravana is Sita's father?

This 'story' has its roots in verse from the samhita part of Veds, which all Sanskrit scholars, since old times, have said, has been wrongly translated. 

But some people, in old times, for some ulterior motives, still decided to keep the wrong translation, and try make it a part of Ramayan.

I've seen that samhita verse, and so, if you can trust my opinion, this story is totally bogus, an utter fraud.   


Very well said! This story is totally inaccurate, because the Ramayan clearly mentions that Sita was ayonija. She was not born of any human womb. She came from the Earth when Maharaj Janak was ploughing it for a yagna. Neither was Ravan her biological father, nor Janak himself. So any version that has Sita being born from someone's womb, whether it be Mandodari or Sunaina, is totally wrong.

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

sherlockProud-India

Go to top

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Check these Celebrity also

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index