Originally posted by: smruti1981
sandy, he is not mahan in my eyes at all.. but they are improving the character that what am saying.. yes he was too much negative in past.. i don' t deny for that.. but now he is positive some how.. rajiv and mayank characterization are quite different..rajiv was positive in past before rachna s engagement broken and was positive after that fiasco also.. but his characterization has been changed. and that s why i always call him double standard..if they would show him as was in past i would def welcome gunjiv also. but they changed rajiv and made gunjiv so i can never fall for gunjiv ... . and cvs got away showing him resigning from job to show him so called man of principles.. but mayank was not so much positive in past and they are now making him positive. we both have different eyes and different minds.. and different pov.. so we cannot agree with each other ever.. i have not told you and your friends are over reacting with this..i just wanted to say that please watch episode once that how that hug was.. and i have seen all characters change overnight..not for rajiv only.. and even not shail now.. who is getting agree for dowry .. i know mayank is always proved wrong in many persons eyes.. but am telling about him what is he in current situation... even i cannot favor enough for vihan also the way they are scrapping vina story rather than developing proper way the way i can tell that vihan is mahan in my eyes.. no way.. they are just turning characters 180 degree. they do not want to invest time in proper development of mayank and vihan like jagdish of BV they believes it as waste of time...
and if my one of friend would tell me to watch episode if am wrong i will not take as rude statement
comment:
p_commentcount