TOI: Replacements work in favour-Toral - Page 2

u know wat.. itz kinda funny.. mayb they did not expect such a kind of backlash over a replacement.. now tat they r gettin the heat from the fans.. they r goin all out n pullin all the strings to make us do wit  their ''perfect replacement'' theory 

And still they insist ..."viewers have accepted Toral as Anandi..." 🤣

I think they should replace Dadaisa and shiv too.. After all BV can create magic with anything... After all people watch it for story character etc etc... So anyway the show will go on... Why invest on these actors?

Its one thing to go ahead and say ' Replacements take time to work. It is difficult...but we cant help it. People will eventually accept it if the content is good". 

Comparing Surekhaji (Dadisa) to Pratyusha is ludicrous!  It's like comparing Shabana Azmi to Prachi Desai.  Who knew Pratyusha before BV?  Nobody.  All her accolades have been achieved through this show.   She has a long long way to go to prove her mettle.

@ Pari - No one is comparing Surekha ji with Prats. The statement by the producer that the actors are not bigger than the show and its easy to replace has lead to the statement - if actors are that easy to replace, then go ahead and replace the others too and see if you can create the magic.

these replacement all worked😕
ktlk has 0.5 trp with reolacement🤣 from 1.5 plus at 2 slots  earlier before replaced
and WEDDING TRACK HAD 0.8 😆Edited by NandiniSh - 11 years ago

There is no doubt on Surekhaji's talent. I am just saying story and characters are important and so are actors... If they don't add their magic to it, it will be nothing.. BV thinks they can replace anyone and get away with it.. It's not that easy... No offence to any senior and respectable actor. 

Ha ha... Avika to Prats replacement there is some sense into to.. people are convinced with the change.. P proved to be an excellent choice.. Timing for replacement T is wrong. With T the whole character sketch of Anandi is changed. There is no A. Audi accepted T.. yes, if the article writer is the sole audience