Originally posted by: runes
In TV serials all the positive and negative characters are shown to be extremists to make it interesting. The good person only has good qualities while the antagonist (Gauri) has all the bad and are shown to have no conscience. In real life many normal people are somewhere in the middle of the spectrum. But I still don't understand how can people justify and defend Gauri when the CV's are clearly portraying that she is mean and cruel.
Agreed.
Anandi and Gauri are on the extreme sides of a spectrum where Anandi is super good/mahaan and Gauri is super bad/crazy. This is how you create a worthwhile serial.
In real life, most people are in the middle. Most people would not tolerate someone who cheated on them like Anandi did. Most people would not be as evil, dumb, or manipulative as Gauri is and has been.
For the ones who are answering this question with Gauri...
How many people do you know who would marry a married person despite the fact that it will not be recognized legally? Would you marry a married individual and then sabotage people's lives? Would you or people you know yell at someone who has been funding your/their expensive education? Would you or people you know drive around carelessly, or engage in other risky behavior while pregnant?
I really think people are underestimating Gauri's insanity here.
comment:
p_commentcount