4/4 Written Update/Analysis Unit: Bidhaai ke Samay - Page 4

@Samana :I can understand your anger ..u had to update it all about Gayatri and then write a take 😆..seriously I felt like going inside my TV and giving her a tight slap when she teaches Paridi how to bend and then puts that awful condition in front of Shobha 😡😡...Oh I will get real sadistic pleasure when Paridi's parents will actually decide to hv a hliday date of one month in Scindia household and will hijack Gayatri and Daddy Scindia's room first 😈😆😆

@Samana: I don't know if you've read my take yet, but we have both again struck a similar note on Gayatri and her lines drawn for her daughters-in-law.

If Yash comes forward and support Arati tomorrow, that will give the first good impression about him for Arati. But still it will more time to completely understand what kind of a person he is in real.But for Yash to support Arati, he should atleast hear what gayatri and Shobha are talking about.

Originally posted by: skanda12

 

Jyoti, even my discomfort is that so far Yash has been so preoccpied with his guilt over Arpita and then the mechanics of going through this shaadi, that he has not started watching his parents in action! I sincerely hope he comes to see his parents are behaving! Unless Yash gets to grips with this, his parents are going to have a ball "teaching the rules" to the two bahus and making their lives miserable. Hope Yash wakes up soon!

This is not entirely true. I agree that he has been preoccupied but he has not been blind, or at least when other people have forcibly opened his eyes from Arpita-sleep he has taken definitive and affirmative action. And he has seen his parents in action, just not the entirety of it.

He saw them put that awful condition about Ansh forth in the first place (which he made them take back)

He saw them forcibly giving Aarti Arpita's name and indentity (and he went and tried to fight it immediately)

He heard Gayatri talk about all of the things Aarti has been arguing against, like the name change and heard her misconceptions about Aarti's character with the temple episode. And here he just got up from the mandap and went to ask her what was wrong.

So Yash has this power and aura that his parents can't seem to refute. In the case of the first condition of Gayatri against Ansh also, SP didn't say a word but let Gayatri do her manmaani until Yash himself spoke, and he smiled contentedly. Perhaps we will see that here also. Maybe he knows that Yash will insist on Ansh coming and thinks how great that would look in front of the biradri. I wouldn't put it past him.

@Jyo: Great take, especially the part about Yash fulfilling his vows. I too feel like he will be instrumental in making sure Aarti is allowed to be the best mother she can be. And he knows that she will be nothing but an empty shell without Ansh. So if only for his kids and because of his foresight, he will protect Ansh's right to come home with them.

@Mansi: Hi5! We both mentioned the classic divide and rule by Gayatri. 😡

Gayatri is shown over dominating today with both her bahus ..Paridi as well as Aarti ...

After reading most of you, I am wondering the scene of Ansh falling is created for Gayatri or Yash...

Thanks for the lovely update 😃

@Mansi and Samana  :I feel Yash is well aware of the family politics and mayb thats why keeps himself away from it and is preoccupied with either his work or with his kids ...he just give it all a royal ignore 😆

Originally posted by: skanda12

 

I think maybe you are a touch too charitable to Gayatri when you say that she herself is oppressed enough to get her thrills this way. But seriously, there should be some decorum even among the oppressed not to start their oppression of others right from the bidaii moment itself!

 

Surely a little gap of time before doing the nasty stuff would not be such a torture? Or are the oppressed so oppressed that they have to vent at the earliest?

 

 

Oh I agree! I am not excusing Gayatri but trying to justify the subconscious motives behind her behaviour. She is in front of her saas so perhaps I felt there was the need to overcompensate her power over her bahus.

I felt sorry for her in a "she is pathetic and disgusting" kind of way, not a "poor baby" kind of way, if you get my drift. 😆

Actually thinking about it, what really got my goat about her was when she told Dubey and Shobha that they wouldn't be there to look after Ansh and so Aarti would be preoccupied. I mean he is part of their family now and any members of their family could have watched Ansh while Aarti did the rasams. The whole issue came up because the kids were left to their own devices. Aarti may be a concerned parent, but she is not that obsessive. She would have been fine if there was someone looking after Ansh, like Pankaj did at the wedding. There are so many holes in Gayatri's logic.

Argh I am just tying my brain in knots with all this rage! 😡😡😡😆

Originally posted by: Samanalyse

This is not entirely true. I agree that he has been preoccupied but he has not been blind, or at least when other people have forcibly opened his eyes from Arpita-sleep he has taken definitive and affirmative action. And he has seen his parents in action, just not the entirety of it.

He saw them put that awful condition about Ansh forth in the first place (which he made them take back)

He saw them forcibly giving Aarti Arpita's name and indentity (and he went and tried to fight it immediately)

He heard Gayatri talk about all of the things Aarti has been arguing against, like the name change and heard her misconceptions about Aarti's character with the temple episode. And here he just got up from the mandap and went to ask her what was wrong.

So Yash has this power and aura that his parents can't seem to refute. In the case of the first condition of Gayatri against Ansh also, SP didn't say a word but let Gayatri do her manmaani until Yash himself spoke, and he smiled contentedly. Perhaps we will see that here also. Maybe he knows that Yash will insist on Ansh coming and thinks how great that would look in front of the biradri. I wouldn't put it past him.