Pavitra Rishta

India-Forums

   
Pavitra Rishta
Pavitra Rishta

archana is way worse than manjusha !! (Page 2)

koolsadhu1000 IF-Sizzlerz
koolsadhu1000
koolsadhu1000

Joined: 03 July 2007
Posts: 20976

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 8:33am | IP Logged
I don't think prasad meant that since the first child was a boy  the other children should not not follow. I think prasad meant it in an economical sense ...that if you do not have financial capacity or the capacity to raise children why give them birth at all .

Hey prasad . Why don't you correct that statement and remove the BOY and waaris part as to many it may not be clear as to what your point is . I don't want even this post closed down . This time your language is perfect . Not objectionable . 

I know what you are saying . SULMAN r from that era where fundas were simple ...the male child earned for the household and the female children were given away . But since times have changed , many will not understand what you were trying to say . I did , though . And I think its a shame that each time your POV is shut down . So do the corrections buddy .

About the unbelievable things heard in the forum , I don't even want to start on that part .  But if mods closes down this post , I will sure have my say .  




Edited by koolsadhu1000 - 21 December 2011 at 8:33am

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

bhallaroxDabulls23

Tanyaz IF-Stunnerz
Tanyaz
Tanyaz

Joined: 03 December 2009
Posts: 37059

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 8:35am | IP Logged
Having a child is a blessing and it should not matter weather it is a boy or a girl ...

The following 6 member(s) liked the above post:

AnijoyceSportsFreakbhallaroxKittya_CullensuanSunoNa...

Tanyaz IF-Stunnerz
Tanyaz
Tanyaz

Joined: 03 December 2009
Posts: 37059

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 8:36am | IP Logged
Originally posted by koolsadhu1000

I
Hey prasad . Why don't you correct that statement and remove the BOY and waaris part as to many it may not be clear as to what your point is . I don't want even this post closed down . This time your language is perfect . Not objectionable . 


Well that is exactly what I have found very objectionable ... and yes , he should remove this immediately .
This very thought is extremely objectionable to me ..

Edited by Tanyaz - 21 December 2011 at 8:38am

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

devashree_hSunoNa...

prasad1991 Goldie

Joined: 16 November 2010
Posts: 943

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 8:40am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

The following 4 member(s) liked the above post:

Cupcake4GHTbhallaroxkoolsadhu1000Dabulls23

koolsadhu1000 IF-Sizzlerz
koolsadhu1000
koolsadhu1000

Joined: 03 July 2007
Posts: 20976

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 8:41am | IP Logged
How I read prasad's post

Children shud be allowed by seeing economical capacity

If economic capacity is limited and yet children r born ...dont  beg or fleece others for money , bring them up in ur own way

Yes Saviita and Damodar too had 3 children and we have no way of knowing if they came when Damodar was earning well as an actor ...if the alcoholism followed later

But whatever the fact ...Savita Damodar did not fleece another family for their needs . They managed in their own finances . Its the Karanjkars who made another family pay for their needs and that was a shameless act  . That was what prasad was trying to say and thats exactly how I read the post .

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

bhallarox

prasad1991 Goldie

Joined: 16 November 2010
Posts: 943

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 8:46am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Dabulls23

ChannaMereya IF-Stunnerz
ChannaMereya
ChannaMereya

Joined: 06 November 2010
Posts: 43925

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 8:58am | IP Logged
Sorry did not wanted to butt in but prasad I found it objectionable too that u stated waaris and all stuff come off it u mean ppl should have second child only if first one is a daughter ah? How insane is that well I think we have come of those times now atleast and manav was not right in buying nor was he right in trusting Savita so why not hold him equally responsible for the mess

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Tanyaz

prasad1991 Goldie

Joined: 16 November 2010
Posts: 943

Posted: 21 December 2011 at 9:05am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
Idiot Archana or Emotional Archana

Author: LoveTVShows   Replies: 9   Views: 3056

LoveTVShows 9 3056 04 December 2011 at 3:53am by krnagu
Bored of this Manjusha

Author: krnagu   Replies: 9   Views: 1130

krnagu 9 1130 20 July 2011 at 7:37am by swtbaby
manjusha

Author: hk111990   Replies: 6   Views: 1263

hk111990 6 1263 24 May 2011 at 11:07pm by Dabulls23
Vinod & Manjusha

Author: sme123   Replies: 8   Views: 1346

sme123 8 1346 09 January 2011 at 6:54pm by desicrowd

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Pavitra Rishta Topic Index

  • Please login to check your Last 10 Topics posted

Check these Celebrity also

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index