\|/Doubts & Discussions about Lord Shiva Part-1\|/ - Page 117

First Previous

page

118

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Kriti Jain

@wildcat1994

Senior Member

Posted: 11 years ago

my question...when are Ambika, saraswati n lakshmi (shiv's daughters) entering this show???

Quote

Vrish

@Vr15h

Viewbie

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

Saraswati & Lakshmi are already in the show, and they are not Shiva's daughters, except in Bong tradition, as is shown during Durga Puja. Even Ambika is a form of Devi Parvati when she was approached by Shumbha.

Shiva's only 2 daughters, AFAIK, were Asokasundari and Manasa Devi. Both of them are known only in some folklore, and are certainly not as universal as Kartikeya and Ganesh.

I'd be more interested in seeing Devasena back and marrying Kartikeya, rather than umpty marriages of Shiva & Parvati.

Quote

Kal El

@Kal El

IF-Rockerz

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

I was going through some of older episodes and there's something I wanted to point out. Remember the episode about Upamanyu? On the show Mahadev appeared as a random king to test the boy. But according to the Shiva Purana he appeared in the form of Indra in front of Upamanyu. The show basically kept his personality intact but made him some anonymous king instead.
Edited by Kal El - 11 years ago

Quote

Revathi Gopal

@Rheva

Senior Member

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: MahadevBhakt1
Hi,

I am more confused about what this show is telling. Adding to it...

Lord Vishnu incarnated as Shri Ram at sati's time(when mata sati was alive) & slayed dashanan Ravana. After thousands of years, Aadishakti reborn as parvati & got married to Mahadev. Now this show is showing us that the same dashanan ravan who was slayed by Shri Ram thousands of years ago has made bhavan for Lord Shiva & his family. From where ravana has appeared again? Can any one answer to my question please...

Thanks & Regards

YES, I'M ALSO CONFUSED, PLEASE EXPLAIN IN MORE DETAIL.

Quote

Rayan

@MrToolConfuser

IF-Sizzlerz

Posted: 11 years ago

@Rheva Heres it.

Originally posted by: mnx12

Sati was shown time travelling in future to test Ram, as they both existed in different Yugas. Was shown suffering for that deed in present by the makers., where as Ram is yet to take birth in the show.Some stories in Puranas are added later on , which doesn't have logical connection with the main story, but is accepted by some because it is written in Puranas. This is one such story. Some even say this Sati was from another Kalpa, but why did this Kalpa's Sati has to suffer for other Kalpa's Sati. Some questions doen't have logical explanation to them, sati testing Ram is one such story.

Quote

Kriti Jain

@wildcat1994

Senior Member

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: .Vrish.
Saraswati & Lakshmi are already in the show, and they are not Shiva's daughters, except in Bong tradition, as is shown during Durga Puja. Even Ambika is a form of Devi Parvati when she was approached by Shumbha.

Shiva's only 2 daughters, AFAIK, were Asokasundari and Manasa Devi. Both of them are known only in some folklore, and are certainly not as universal as Kartikeya and Ganesh.

I'd be more interested in seeing Devasena back and marrying Kartikeya, rather than umpty marriages of Shiva & Parvati.

In regions around kailash, RIVER SARASWATI is believed to be SHIV-PARVATI's daughter, Ambika is d daughter of durga-shiv n i m unsure of lakshmi but this lakshmi n vishnu's wife r diff frm each-other...don't confuse urself btwn tem!!!

Quote

Sharita

@Meynika

Senior Member

Posted: 11 years ago

A huge blooper I think...

In the current track Jalandhar is born in Parvati era (Sati in previous life).

But Prasuti (Sati's mother) already told the Tulsi and Jalandhar story in one of the early episodes (Jan or Feb 2012 somewhere).

Is this a mistake?

Quote

Surya Sundarraj Sriram

@Surya_krsnbhakt

IF-Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Meynika
A huge blooper I think...

In the current track Jalandhar is born in Parvati era (Sati in previous life).

But Prasuti (Sati's mother) already told the Tulsi and Jalandhar story in one of the early episodes (Jan or Feb 2012 somewhere).

Is this a mistake?

Yes, this is one of the BIG Bloopers of DKDM. Ignore it.

Quote

Surya Sundarraj Sriram

@Surya_krsnbhakt

IF-Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

OKay, my doubt might sound irrelevant to the topic, but its connected.

We all know that our great Vyasa Bhagavan wrote different versions in different Puranas. He made different deities Supreme. Also, all Puranas were narated by Ugrasrava Sauti to Saunaka and others. So, when the write is same, and orator is same, and audience is same, HOW COME the audience didn't get confused abt the different versions. Like for example:

Sauti (while saying Shiva Purana): Jalandhar was the ansh of shiva's anger and he married vrinda. He lusted after Parvati but because of his wife's pativrata dharma, he couldn't be killed. So Vishnu took Jalandhar's form and lived with VRinda. So her dharm was destroyed and Jalandhar was killed.

Saunaka and others: OKay OKay.

Sauti (during Devi BHagavata): Shankhachooda was an incarnation of Shridama, the parisada of Sri KRishna and Radha, adn he married tulasi. because of his wife's pativrata dharma, he couldn't be killed. So Vishnu took Shankhachooda's form and lived with Tulasi. So her dharm was destroyed and Shankhachooda was killed.

So why didn't Saunaka say this: HEY! YOu have already told this SAME story! Your just replacing names. Its the same story. ARe you lying or what? Don't confuse us like this.. Blah blah

Quote

Kriti Jain

@wildcat1994

Senior Member

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Surya_krsnbhakt
OKay, my doubt might sound irrelevant to the topic, but its connected.

We all know that our great Vyasa Bhagavan wrote different versions in different Puranas. He made different deities Supreme. Also, all Puranas were narated by Ugrasrava Sauti to Saunaka and others. So, when the write is same, and orator is same, and audience is same, HOW COME the audience didn't get confused abt the different versions. Like for example:

Sauti (while saying Shiva Purana): Jalandhar was the ansh of shiva's anger and he married vrinda. He lusted after Parvati but because of his wife's pativrata dharma, he couldn't be killed. So Vishnu took Jalandhar's form and lived with VRinda. So her dharm was destroyed and Jalandhar was killed.
Saunaka and others: OKay OKay.

Sauti (during Devi BHagavata): Shankhachooda was an incarnation of Shridama, the parisada of Sri KRishna and Radha, adn he married tulasi. because of his wife's pativrata dharma, he couldn't be killed. So Vishnu took Shankhachooda's form and lived with Tulasi. So her dharm was destroyed and Shankhachooda was killed.
So why didn't Saunaka say this: HEY! YOu have already told this SAME story! Your just replacing names. Its the same story. ARe you lying or what? Don't confuse us like this.. Blah blah

well, yes the puranas were written, narrated by same people but the problem is that the original versions were mixed with subsequent versions written by diff people. during that time. The historians are still unsure if d puranas as we know them today were the ones that were written by VYASA Bhagwan or others have just put additions in the earlier versions.

since, the text in d puranas of today has been edited by several others during the same period, differenciating the original from edited version is difficult...hope u understand tis!!!

Quote

1 ... 114 115 116 117 118