Originally posted by: VibhishnaWatching the past few episodes, Lord Vishnu and Lord Brahma were pleading with Lord Shiva to resurrect Daksh. Why exactly was Daksh required to live? I thought, he was resurrected when Prastuti pleaded for her husband's life but didn't understand why Vishnu and Brahma wanted Daksh alive.
Originally posted by: .Vrish.
VibsFrom what I recall reading, the reason the devas wanted Daksha resurrected was so that the yagna would be complete. Even though the purpose of that yagna was to slight Shiva. Probably, not completing a yagna would have serious repercussions, which is why they begged Shiva to let it continue.
Originally posted by: VibhishnaVanadhi, I'm fine. Hope to hear the same from you.
Thanks for the explanations, but the storyline is still confusing to me.
There's so much I don't know about and the dialect (or should I say the choice of words?) are quite different from other mytho serials. Maybe its just me - I'm trying to understand the dialogues with the limited number of Hindi and Sanskrit words I know but somehow quite a lot of words seem unfamiliar to me. I can understand what the character is trying to say but don't know what exactly it means. The dialogues from Sagar's shows were different.
Originally posted by: VibhishnaAs per the series, Lord Shiva had to cut himself off Devi Shakthi for the creation to continue. But why was it that Devi Shakthi had to be born in human form? Couldn't they have lived like Lord Vishnu and Goddess Lakshmi or Lord Brahma and Devi Saraswathi?
Originally posted by: .Vrish.What I'm curious about is how mainstream is the belief that Vishnu used his discus to chop up Sati's body, since only one purana - the Markandeya purana - mentions it? Somehow, it just sounds too cruel, and not characteristic of Narayan at all! Yeah, the people @ the 51 shakti peeths, like Kamakhya, would definitely believe it, but is this something widely accepted that Vishnu did?Dat's bcoz shiv did not wanted 2 perform da last rites of sati.he was not in a state 2 understand and da Gods had no time 2 wait as asuras were creating trouble on da earth so Vishnu had no oder option but 2 cut off sati's body.
Was Parvati born as a human? Himavat was the mountain god representative of the Himalayas. So would his daughter have been human, even though she lived on earth? Ganga was his other daughter as well, but even she was divine, except for the brief period during her curse when she was married to Shantanu. So it would seem that Parvati too was divine, but nonetheless had to perform severe austerities in order to win Mahadev's acceptance.Dat's what i too don't understand yaar.As far as i know,even though Gods took deir avatars and became humans but dey were still considered as Gods bcoz dey still had da power of God.Ram was God,Sita was Goddess,Krishna was God,Hanuman was God so in dis case even Parvati and Ganga r also goddesses.And if dey will show Parvati as Goddess den da big qn.will arise,why was sati not considered a Goddess den?I am wondering how will da cvs justify demselves and how dey will show everything.On the language, I find the language here authentic, but somewhat unusual given some of the concepts they've borrowed, such as ahuti (sacrifice, but usually, a different term is used for offerings which I'm forgetting at the moment). Given some of the recent serials that I've seen, that are either based in pre-Muslim era in India or even worse, mytho serials that freely use Urdu based words, I'd say DkDM is far better.
Originally posted by: vanadhi
Ya me too fine .I think u are talking about our forum's famous word's like Ashist, Shadayantra ,Adiprasanatha , Ahuthi ,peeda etc😆 me to perplexed for the first time when i heard , later its practiced for me to be glued .since daksha is different, his familie's dialect too different 😆 ..hope the written update archives will help u a lot
comment:
p_commentcount