Bollywood News, Bollywood Movies, Bollywood Chat

India-Forums

   
Bollywood News, Bollywood Movies, Bollywood Chat
Bollywood News, Bollywood Movies, Bollywood Chat

Vidya gives SLEEPLESS nights to Kareena & Priyanka (Page 15)

Sultan_Of_Swing IF-Sizzlerz
Sultan_Of_Swing
Sultan_Of_Swing

Joined: 11 October 2011
Posts: 11615

Posted: 17 December 2011 at 3:03pm | IP Logged
A very nice article from Vir Sanghvi

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/Why-Vidya-Balan-rules/Article1-783531.aspx


Why Vidya Balan rules
Vir Sanghvi,
New Delhi, December 17, 2011

First Published: 12:25 IST(17/12/2011)
Last Updated: 18:27 IST(17/12/2011)

Is it because The Dirty Picture has stormed the box office? Is it because she's so good in the film? Or is it because she has flouted every rule in the Bollywood book and emerged a winner on her own terms?

I think I've cracked it. For two weeks now everyone I know  and possibly most of urban India  has been going crazy about Vidya Balan. Nearly everywhere you go she is the subject of discussion and the conversations are nearly always flattering.

The obvious point of reference is The Dirty Picture. For two months before the movie released, Vidya was everywhere. Never before in the history of Indian cinema has a star done so much publicity for a film. And The Dirty Picture was not even a big budget special effects extravaganza like say Ra.One. But Vidya appeared on every television show you could think of (and many that you would never have thought of) and in every print publication.

Talking to her for this interview (and for my Star World show) I asked her what had involved more hard work: the promotion or the actual filming? She took a while to answer and even then she wasn't really sure. My guess is that the promotion took much more effort.

So perhaps India is going crazy over Vidya Balan because she is so ubiquitous today, more omnipresent than even Anna Hazare.
We talk of Vidya's courage only in terms of her willingness to play a sex symbol in The Dirty Picture. But compared to the other things she's done in her life, this is no big deal

Or could it be that everyone loved The Dirty Picture? The box office figures suggest that it will be a massive hit not just relative to its (somewhat modest) budget but compared to most other films released this year. Obviously, this is a picture that everyone has seen and liked.

Or it could be that they all think that Vidya is terrific in the movie (which she is)? Few actresses could have carried off that role with so much aplomb and managed to hold their own against an actor of the calibre of Naseeruddin Shah who gives one of his best ever performances. But if you ask me it's none of these things.

Vidya and Emraan in a still from the film The Dirty Picture

My view is that India has fallen in love with Vidya Balan all over again (and we've been here before after the release of Parineeta and once again after Lage Raho Munnabhai though it's never been quite so intense) not because of her current ubiquity or because of any individual film but because we have finally come to terms with who she is.

In an industry full of size zero figures, dancing bimbettes and self-consciously trendy bejeaned muppets, Vidya comes off as a breath of fresh air.

Basically, it's this simple: she is a real person.

ParineetaEverything about her is real: the curves, the little roll of fat that she makes no attempt to hide, the clothes that she chooses herself, the roles that she agonises over before finally selecting one that suits her, the hard work she puts into each performance and then into the promotion, and most of all, the guts she demonstrates in finding her own path against the advice of nearly everybody in Bollywood.

We talk of Vidya's courage only in terms of her willingness to play a southern sex symbol in The Dirty Picture. But compared to the other things she's done in her life, this is no big deal.


In fact, her whole story is one of courage in the face of impossible odds.

Born and brought up in Bombay to a middle class south Indian family, Vidya had a dream: to become an actress. But while other girls with that dream would want to be glamorous heroines, Vidya focused on the acting itself.

Each evening she would stare at the mirror and re-enact Shabana Azmi's dialogues from Arth. A particular favourite was the bit where Shabana tells Smita Patil to leave her man alone.

"I kept trying to cry because that was what the scene required," she remembers. "But I didn't know about glycerine in those days and I wasn't sure how to make the tears come. All the same, I kept trying."

PaaGood middle class south Indian families do not react with delight when their daughters tell them that they want to join Bollywood. So Vidya's parents insisted that she went to St Xavier's College and studied. She did her BA and then an MA in Sociology.

"My father said that I could always become an actress," she recalls. "But I couldn't go back to college later in life. So I had to first finish my education and then I could do what I wanted. At the time I was not pleased but now, I can't thank him enough. My parents were absolutely right."

The education explains why Vidya started off late. But nothing explains why things kept going wrong for so long.

She was eventually signed up for a Malayalam film and though it wasn't the Bollywood career she dreamt of, at least it was a beginning. Moreover, she was starring with Mohanlal, a legendary figure in Malayalam cinema and one of her idols.

But Mohanlal had a problem with the film's makers. And so, halfway through, the movie was abandoned, never to be completed.

Because Mohanlal is such a big deal in the south, it was unusual for one of his movies to remain incomplete. And the film industry, ever quick to blame a newcomer, decided it was because Vidya Balan brought bad luck to the project.

She could have survived this debacle but a second film also ended in disaster. Four days into the shooting she was replaced. The makers decided that they did not want the Balan jinx.

What followed was heartbreaking. In the initial flush of excitement after she had been cast as Mohanlal's heroine, she had signed a dozen Malayalam films. She was sacked from every single one of them.

JessicaShe tried Tamil cinema and found a role. There too, things went wrong. The producer also decided that she was a jinx and she was replaced. She signed a second Tamil film, got to the sets and discovered that it was a sex comedy. She had been signed up under false pretences. Naturally she walked out. And as naturally, she was replaced once again.

Desperate to find some work at least, she agreed to act in a Euphoria music video directed by Pradeep Sarkar. This time she was not replaced and the video was completed but there was a fight between labels and the release of the video was stalled.

So, after three years in the film industry, Vidya Balan had been replaced in twelve Malayalam movies, two Tamil films and had made one music video which had been caught up in a legal quagmire and not released.
 
You tell me: wouldn't you give up at this stage? Anybody else would.

But Vidya wouldn't. And she didn't.

I asked her about her state of mind during that phase. She says that it took every ounce of will power to keep from giving up.

She went everywhere for roles: on one occasion she walked from Nariman Point to Bandra, a considerable distance. At other times, she sat for hours at the Saibaba temple praying with tears running down her cheeks. ("I am a person with a lot of faith and I have conversations all the time but I am not so religious in the conventional, organised sense," she says).

Then, slowly, her luck began to change. She was cast in a Bengali film and discovered that she was a Bengali at heart and learnt to speak the language fluently. (She even sings Bengali songs, one of which she sang on camera for me when I seemed somewhat dubious about her linguistic abilities).

Vidya Balan in a still from the film Ishqiya


Pradeep Sarkar who had kept casting her in ad films and other music videos never lost faith. He had planned to make Parineeta for producer Vidhu Vinod Chopra and insisted that Vidya would make a perfect heroine.

Naturally, Chopra was leery of investing money in a first-time director and a virtual newcomer as an actress. He insisted on auditioning Vidya and she says she has lost count of the number of auditions she did over a period of several months.

Finally, Chopra gave in. He agreed with Sarkar that she was the perfect choice for the role and agreed to sign her.

By all rights, Vidya should have been a nervous wreck. Her career had stalled in two different film industries (Malayalam and Tamil) and her reputation for bringing bad luck to projects had spread far and wide. This was really a make or break situation for her.

But oddly enough, she says, she was never nervous. She knew what was at stake. She knew it was her last chance. And she knew that the camera was her best friend. ("The camera is my confidante," she says. "I speak directly to it.").

So she gave it everything she had. And the rest is history.

It hasn't exactly been an uphill struggle since the massive success of Parineeta. Lage Raho Munnabhai gave her the stamp of commercial acceptability and it would have been easy enough for her to have joined the Bollywood rat race since success seemed to come so easily and naturally to her.

Vidya-Naseer

But after some strange films like Heyy Babyy and Kismet Konnection in which she tried to pretend to be what she is not a Bollywood bimbette Vidya decided that this was not part of her original dream.

"At some stage my sister and brother-in-law sat me down and asked me why I had become an actress," she remembers.

"I said it was because I wanted to be different people, to play different characters. And they pointed out what should have been obvious to me. If I was going to do these typical Bollywood films, then I wasn't really playing different characters. It wasn't why I had become an actress at all."

Ask yourself this, if you had only one dream, if that dream had been dashed on the rocks by fate through rejection and replacement and if you finally had found some partial fulfillment of that dream, some measure of success at last, would you really risk it all?

VidyaThe reason I like Vidya Balan ' and I guess the reason all of India loves her so much is because she was ready to start from scratch again. She was willing to walk away from one kind of success. She was ready to take risks that seemed like commercial suicide.

All because she still believed in that original dream, not in the commercial fantasy that it had morphed into.

The films that have come in the latest phase of Vidya Balan's career are not those that a commercially savvy actress would have signed. She agonised for three months before agreeing to do Paa even though it offered her a chance to act with Amitabh Bachchan, an early idol since his Yaarana days. (She even liked that silly outfit with the lightbulbs that was stolen from The Electric Horseman).

It wasn't that she minded playing Amitabh's mother. It was just that she was terrified of screwing up.

As it turned out, she was brilliant. She was terrific as a deglamourised Sabrina Lal in No One Killed Jessica. And she was even better in Ishqiya where she played the kind of character she developed further in The Dirty Picture: a woman who is willing to use her sexuality in the advancement of her own interests.

Even so, The Dirty Picture represented a huge risk. Hindi cinema no longer requires its heroines to be virginal angels of innocence. But I can't think of a single other film where a heroine is shown as seducing a man simply to advance her career and is still treated as a sympathetic character.

VidyaAnd then there was the terrible visual deterioration that her character suffered at the end of the movie. Which heroine would agree to do all this without wondering about the effect on her stardom?

But Vidya took the risk. She liked the role, she said. It offered her a chance to take a character that society looked down on and to invest that person with dignity and depth. Her character didn't have to be somebody you felt sorry for. You just had to accept that she was an independent woman making her own choices in her own interests.

"'Treat her with respect,' was my motto," she says.

Now that the risk has paid off and the film is such a stupendous success, it is easy to say that Vidya was right to take the role. But had it gone wrong, it could well have been career suicide.

Except I don't think that Vidya cares too much about that any longer. She doesn't care about image or about body issues. She's happy to be a star. But she'd much rather be an actress.

At some level, I think all of us recognise that in Vidya we are dealing with a real person who is making real choices and not with some machine-made, image-manipulated Bollywood star. We respect her risks. We admire her resilience. And we know that even if we didn't do all of this, even if we didn't go to see her movies, it would not make that much difference to her.

Because after those years of disappointment, rejection and experimentation, Vidya Balan has found her destiny.

And her destiny is simply this to be her own person. To be Vidya Balan.

From HT Brunch, December 18

Follow us on twitter.com/HTBrunch
Connect with us on facebook.com/hindustantimesbrunch




Edited by Naach_Basanti - 17 December 2011 at 3:04pm

The following 12 member(s) liked the above post:

miley cyrusmentallycrazyTintinleMechantSheldon_Bazingasunflower52TheMummy_LeAbbanoseasyncKai.YusBeePiyatrixLimitLessFanTerenaina

TintinleMechant IF-Dazzler
TintinleMechant
TintinleMechant

Joined: 15 June 2010
Posts: 3105

Posted: 17 December 2011 at 3:05pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by desigal90

Originally posted by masakaliii

 
I think it honestly comes down to the age thing - Vidya looks mature, she has a woman appeal, she wouldn't fit into a golmaal setting.
 
Have to disagree here. I think a really good actress eludes being typecast into a certain genre or mould, or a certain category or appeal.
 
Kareena's been quite good at this. At one point, no one thought hse could do anything beyond the bratty Poo type roles, but she broke outta it.
Today, I'm pretty confident that she can do all sorts of roles. Subtle or loud, mature or immature, young or old, bold or innocent.
She cannot possibly be all those things at once in her real life. But she can pull it off. She cant be physically old and young either, but seh does it. She pairs up with an Imran and Shahid, or an Aamir and Salman.
 
 
 
Bull. Shit.  No matter how much range an actress have, she will be typecast. When i say Vidya doesn't fit into Golmaal, i don't even mean vidya wont be able to do a golmal, i simply mean she wont be CAST In a golmal. No-one wants to see Vidya act young and silly. That is the truth.
 
More importantly, the fact that kareena has done a bunch of movies where she can do lighthearted, funny and silly doesn't mean she has range. It means that our industry MASS PRODUCES those types of films. Its our default film-type, and we also have a default-heroine type that we immediatley jump to. Katrina-Kareena-etc.  Would Vidya have made any sense in Meri Brother Ki Dulhan? EFF NO. Vidya doesn't fit the DEFAULT modern heroine look. That says nothing about range.
 
The fact that Vidya didn't do well in Heyy Baby or KK - i don't really think that say's anything about her abiity to pull off different roles, she certainly has done roles that are demure and quiet, passive, and then agressive and bold. She really doesn't look the way kareena does. It would make zero sense.
 
I'm going to use Anushka Sharma as an example for my claim. She's a fine actress, i truly believe she can do a cute and breezy role to a serious role. Now, say she wanted to do TDP instead of Vidya. In the acting department, Anushka probably would have been able to get into the mindset of silk smitha and do her best in the role. But she lacks the natural sensuality which Vidya has which is key to such a role, and more than that she does not possess the body type required.
 
I'm not saying Karena simply gets her roles because of her physicality, but i am saying that those things do play a significant part when it comes to how one is cast.  Also arn't several of kareena's roles FINE TAILORED for her? Like they write the script with her in mind?

The following 4 member(s) liked the above post:

miley cyrussunflower52Kai.LimitLessFan

desigal90 IF-Stunnerz
desigal90
desigal90

Joined: 14 November 2007
Posts: 37432

Posted: 17 December 2011 at 3:16pm | IP Logged
I'm not talking about being type cast. I mean to be able to pull it off. I still dont think vidya can do it well.
 
And what do you mean Vidya doestn have the default heroine look?
Look at the PHYSICAL range of successful heroines who have pulled off the default heroine roles.
 
How do Kajol, Rani Mukherjee, Priyanka Chopra, or Madhuri look similar? I mean...what is the default heroine look?
 
That has always intrigued me becuase according to me, the kinda actresses that have come and ruled bollywood in those very default heroine looks have been so diverse that I cant even pinpoint what the default heroine look is.
 
And no, a lot of roles Kareena has done were not written with her in mind.
Heroine, I'm not sure.
But JWM was not one that was fine tailored for her. Imtiaz wrote the script and then approached the actors. He actually approached Shahid first, who then took the script to Kareena.
Neither was Omkara written for her. Actually...none of her roles come to mind that any script writer admittedly wrote FOR her.


Edited by desigal90 - 17 December 2011 at 3:17pm

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

LEO88

TintinleMechant IF-Dazzler
TintinleMechant
TintinleMechant

Joined: 15 June 2010
Posts: 3105

Posted: 17 December 2011 at 4:04pm | IP Logged
^ I do very much mean the default modern heroine look.
 
If Vidya had began her career in the 80's or 90's i do not doubt that she would have been a star very quickly. I can see her in several of the roles kajol, rani and madhuri have acted in. She reminds me of an old-school type indian beauty, and not the newer more polished looks that Deepika, Sonam, Katrina bring to the table.
 
My point is ultimatley that there are some looks that not all actresses can embody. And she loses a lot of roles because she very quickly got typecast as an 'aunty' due to her fluctuating weight. I think she has significant range, she doesnt go on overdrive to do several movies though and i think its because she is picky.
 
Not just that, but you are claiming that Vidya can't do kareena type roles based on two of her failures (Hey baby and KK). Even kareena has failed at several of the light and breezy roles she has portrayed (In Kambaqt Ishq, even Bodygaurd was a major letdown).
 
What is really your basis for saying Vidya doesnt have range? Is it because she hasn't done enough light and breezy films. Is it because Kareena has just generally done more films?
 
PS: I don't want this to take a turn for the worst, so i'm just going to put it out there that i'm not in this to fight or anything, I just want to know where you're coming from.


Edited by masakaliii - 17 December 2011 at 4:06pm

The following 5 member(s) liked the above post:

miley cyrus_notinuse_ana1sunflower52LimitLessFan

TheRowdiest IF-Stunnerz
TheRowdiest
TheRowdiest

Joined: 17 February 2006
Posts: 29744

Posted: 17 December 2011 at 4:15pm | IP Logged
I m happy Vidya is getting what she deserves and her Movie is Such a Big hit without any Khan ...but bcz of her and strong Story and it was a heroine oriented movie

Hope now those ppl will think Twice before claiming their full contribution in the success of 300 cr earning movie for their 15 min role Tongue
_Sano_ IF-Stunnerz
_Sano_
_Sano_

Joined: 07 December 2005
Posts: 33530

Posted: 17 December 2011 at 4:28pm | IP Logged
i think she is the the same kinda league as madhurio.. where her movies were known for from her name
 
ps. im not comparing her.. but just aying what i think
desigal90 IF-Stunnerz
desigal90
desigal90

Joined: 14 November 2007
Posts: 37432

Posted: 17 December 2011 at 4:28pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by masakaliii

^ I do very much mean the default modern heroine look.
 
If Vidya had began her career in the 80's or 90's i do not doubt that she would have been a star very quickly. I can see her in several of the roles kajol, rani and madhuri have acted in. She reminds me of an old-school type indian beauty, and not the newer more polished looks that Deepika, Sonam, Katrina bring to the table.
 
My point is ultimatley that there are some looks that not all actresses can embody. And she loses a lot of roles because she very quickly got typecast as an 'aunty' due to her fluctuating weight. I think she has significant range, she doesnt go on overdrive to do several movies though and i think its because she is picky.
 
Not just that, but you are claiming that Vidya can't do kareena type roles based on two of her failures (Hey baby and KK). Even kareena has failed at several of the light and breezy roles she has portrayed (In Kambaqt Ishq, even Bodygaurd was a major letdown).
 
What is really your basis for saying Vidya doesnt have range? Is it because she hasn't done enough light and breezy films. Is it because Kareena has just generally done more films?
 
PS: I don't want this to take a turn for the worst, so i'm just going to put it out there that i'm not in this to fight or anything, I just want to know where you're coming from.
 
First of all, dont worry. This is not gonna take any turn for the worst. I can already tell by your tone Smile
 
I think what my basis is that I've seen Kareena successfully nail something in various genres whereas with Vidya I've seen her do a certain kind of cinema, but not really excell in the more mainstream "default heroine" roles you mentioned.
 
I dont think that's a bad thing, BUT it does give Kareena an edge to be able to slip into different kinds of roles with a lot more ease than Vidya who, as you mentioned, doesnt fit into the default heroine role
 
 
smarie IF-Rockerz

Joined: 07 September 2005
Posts: 9651

Posted: 17 December 2011 at 10:19pm | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

ruky786

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Author Replies Views Last Post
Shahid-Kareena / Kareena-saif for Manish Malhotra

2 3 4 5 6

Author: PCRocks   Replies: 40   Views: 21793

PCRocks 40 21793 03 April 2010 at 4:27am by lalixlily
Priyanka In Fashion VS Priyanka in WYR

2

Author: Taify   Replies: 14   Views: 7273

Taify 14 7273 15 October 2009 at 4:54pm by Taify
Kareena in MAMK vs Kareena in Kurbaan?

2 3

Author: desigal90   Replies: 18   Views: 10081

desigal90 18 10081 25 September 2009 at 4:04pm by DEEENCH
do u like slim kareena or kareena before?

2 3 4 5

Author: topgun11   Replies: 35   Views: 8608

topgun11 35 8608 15 March 2008 at 2:53pm by byefor

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Bollywood News, Bollywood Movies, Bollywood Chat Topic Index

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index