Originally posted by: lippi
You guys have finally managed to provoke me to watch today's episode.
Seriously, everyone here is discussing how wrong sky was.
But no one has mentioned when sky said to sid "Aur agar nahi karne ho raha hai tou Amar ko utha dena"
Having Sky said that, he had no right to tell SID off for waking Amar.
SID had his own reasoning but SKY was at fault. Either don't say something or if someone follows it then don't abuse them over it.
SKY started the argument over nothing. He is the one who talks about footage all the time, which clearly shows this is what is in his mind.
He cares about footage and the only way he can get it is by creating a scene.
SID was telling SKY to let go as everyone is asleep. SKY then started getting personal with SID and began to make threats to which, SID responded. His response was not escalating the argument, it was standing up for himself.
Yes, I heard that and I wondered too. But tell me this. If you are assigned a homework by your teacher, and the teacher knows and expects you to do it, cuz you have to do it, what would you do?
So say you have an assignment, and your classmate Joe tells you if you can't do it, leave it, or give it to Jill or Jane or Jonathan, what would you do? Would you listen to Joe??
WHO IS JOE TO ALTER THOSE RULES? What is the teacher there for then?
The same applies to Sky's case. Even if Sky told him to pass the guarding duty to Amar, IT WAS SID WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO MAKE THE JUDGMENT. SKY KAUN HAI??? IT IS SID'S ASSIGNED DUTY, FOR GOD'S SAKE!
That's all I have to say. Sky is not wrong here. He spoke beyond requirement, I agree. But there was no need for Sid to take it literally and actually wake up Amar.
Edited by desi_IFer1 - 12 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount