Parmeet's Insecurities

Parmeet's behavior and taunting abt Karan is sounding a whole lot of insecurities IMHO..

I agree wid u.i lik d fact tat vimmy-satnam calld karan to hav a wrd.bt their content was stupid.every1 in d house cre for sweety happiness includng mona,if karan tinks for his wife wats wrng in it.hav never seen vimmy satnam tellng d same to parmeet abt his parents,nor hav v seen sweety talkng abt his inlaws to parmeet.i was hpng dem to explain karan to tel hetal we luv her.parmeet is gettng gud respct at his sasural,wat else

Varsha Hi, I agree with you…Parmeet is definitely acting OTT. First of all, he is demanding respect like the damad…fine, but that does not necessarily mean that the in-laws will have to bend over backward to fulfill his respect quotient…the in-laws and even younger brother have to be respect, it isn't a one way street…to me being a daughter I would expect my hubby to respect my parents and brother and at the same time my hubby needs to be respected by my family…it isn't a one way street..Yes, he left his family to support Sweety, but wasn't that his duty as being the husband to support his wife, thus fulfilling his duty, his marriage vows and above all his love for sweety, right. So, why is it considered that he has done a upkar when actually he was something that he was bound by duty and love…to be this is a Mahaan act. Now if this was the other way round where Parmeet wasn't fertile, then what could have been expected of Sweety…would the Indian audience could support a divorce based on Parmeet's infertility?

Fine, he doesn't accept Karan's apology, that his decision and choice and so is Karan's decision and choice, right…to me no one should be force to go against his conscious self to do anything that he can't live with…to Karan hia apology is adequate, to Parmeet it isn't, so what next…Karan doesn't have to bend over his knees to please Parmeet…If he is so unhappy in in-law house…he should take her out and live separately, yes bedis forced him to stay when Sweety's wasn't well, but sure he can reason it out…he is working and capable…and how it is a respectable thing to be a 'ghar damad'…beyond me…to me even the most welcomed guest can out-live their 'welcome". He needs tomove on…and how will he accept Karan/Hetal's kid when he isn't exactly in a cordial relationship with the biological parents…not a happy situation for the baby, who is being put in a dangerous situation….

And really, he should be buying a TV just to give tit-for tat, it really doesn't suit him being the damad..it is not for him to teach Hetal/karan a lesson, too bad if Vimmy/Satnam or daarji can't do it…it vis not is place nor his headache…to me he is crossing the fine line that every relation has to maintain…

 

Sorry Varsha ..turned out to be a long post…but I so wanted to say it all😃

Kalapi fantastic post and I totally agree with you..

looks like CV's r hell bent to make all the characters to -ve except mona and her parents ..😆
parmeet is such a sweet character in the beginning ,now see what he became 🤣

vimmy n satnam always wants parmeet to take good care of sweety ..
then what their probl if karan takes care of his wife ..what an irony .. satnam is atleast better than vimmy ...vimmy is  🤬

agree with u .. karan is also hell bent to taunt hetal if vimmy complains ..😡

I think the Bedis do give freedom, even if its a little bit.