I am a huge Kareena, and loved her in all her roles, even her crappy KI one.
Having said that, I do not believe that Kareena is much in charge of her personal life. She has had a mother who made all of their decisions and now she is being led by her boyfriend, that is right, boyfriend. Saif is not her husband, merely a boyfriend, and Pataudi Snr was not her father-in-law, just her boyfriend's father and whom she has known for about 4 years only.
Have Kareena or Saif made an official statement regarding the status of their relationship? No. To the Kapoors, Patuadi is just Kareena's boyfriend's father - why the need for chummy then? Was any of the Patuadi's there for Shammiji's funeral?
Also the bhajan of Babita only taking care of her children and being abandoned by the father and Kapoor's is all bull. Babita was in a relationship with Ranjeet prior to her marriage, true, she was not an accepted daughter-in-law for that reason and Babita's and Randhir's divorce is due to her resuming the relationship - every magazine and gossip paper worth their salt headlined that relationship. Check with older people in the family if they were into Bollywood that time.
Still, a relationship with the children were maintained - check the various pictures of the two girls, especially with Rishi and Neetu Kapoor and their family. There were holidays with the Bachchan family added sometimes. There are quite a few pictures floating around with their grandfather. I understand that Karisma got married from his home as well.
And if all that is untrue and they were truly abandoned by all the Kapoor's and it was just the three against the big bad world, then why don't they abandon the Kapoor surname, ties with the natural family talent and first family of Bollywood mantra and everything else regarding the Kapoors. Why glorify the name all the time if you were treated atrouciously by them?
Babita shrieks and her daughters jump to attention, and she is not above using anything to her purposes.
comment:
p_commentcount