the logic is crappy - Page 3

Manzz...m nt a moderator of this forum...😆 I m just like u..a regular viewer of the show

I dont want to see Vikram getting blamed for theft... he and Neha are too cute.. I will read WU first and if all is well then watch the episode..

Considering the fact that it was not in Vikram's pocket when he was shown together with ram and priya in the next shot...😉 I think it would be safe to say, Vikram dropped it into Ram's pocket😆 Where else could the necklace be safer. Also, what was it about the necklace always finding its rightful master?

😆Ekta maiyya bz spoiling in ths aws0me story to0...🤢

There is no way Ekta will spoil the tempo...infact the next couple of weeks will be the best episodes...guys remember awards are round the corner and people support here is ultimate...

Originally posted by: Neenzoo

There is no way Ekta will spoil the tempo...infact the next couple of weeks will be the best episodes...guys remember awards are round the corner and people support here is ultimate...

BT cvs and logic never goes hand in hand

Originally posted by: KBCFan

yes they wanted to frame Vikram, but the logic used does not make sense. Sid telling vikram to take the necklace from the locker and keep it in his pocket and giving vikram the code for the locker. Cant vikram use his brains and say that the locker is a safer place than his pocket? How could vikram, the supposed business man fall to such baseless logic?