Originally posted by rasyafan
Originally posted by tiny15
Originally posted by ankit111
I hv told liking and disliking acting is subjective view, if u like Rashmi acting it dosent mean everybody sd like her. I hv told many time i find both Rashmi and Tina r average actors. Its not becoz if they pair with someone they will become.good and if not thn bad. Certain emotions r played good by Rashmi but sometime its become monotonous with twisting acting. So i don't find extraordinary acting and its my personal view. As concern to awards thn even Tina hs own few. Dharmendra hd never own awards and as i know Amirkhan also i don't remember own much awards for acting in comparison to less talented actors. So i don't decide good or bad actor on the basis of awards, but my personal views, which depends of only acting and not otherthings. My point was not why people like certain actor but why they like only in particular situation
u r rite!!
me 2 don't think RD & TD as wonderful actresses. rather they r av. but sumtimes their acting in sum situations is v.gud but that doesn't mean tehy r super!! i never find RD's screaming sessions as superb acting rather irritating ones just like sumtimes i find TDs cryibg sessions irritating & not superb!!
and its also true that getting award doesn't mean u r superb acting. if we see in bollywood Manoj Bajpai or Ashutosh Rana or Ashish Vidhyarthi or Tanvi Azami etc. rarely get nominated leave alone awards but they r much better actors than our so-called superstars like srk, salman or eevn aamir!!
and in UT i like Ayub Khan, Vaishali Thakkar & 2 sum extent Rohit Khurana & Garav Chopra!!
U r right Rashmi and Tina are not super actors. But this is their first only show which means that their experience is limited to only uttaran.
i think here u r mistaken abt their 1st show only. RD'd done so many Bhojpuri films & she was quite famous there & she'd also done one show named"Pari hoon" where she'd double role of +ve & -ve ckt!!
and TD'd done bengali cinema & was a child artist. she'd played young Parineeta in Vidhya Balan's Parineeta.
Besides actors like ayub khan Gaurav Chopra Tanvi Azmi etc have years of experience and they have done variety of roles and performances which has made them what they are today "super actors". These experiences have polished them and they have attained great finese. They can pull any sort of roles or dramas and come out victorious.
yeah i agree that they've experience of yrs. but experience of having worked in no. of films or shows doesn't mean all actor r gud or superb.e.g. is Sunil Shetty, Jackie Shroff & so many oders. wen ayub etc.'d started at that time 2 they were gud but their films were not successful so they tried their luck on the TV!!
Rashmi is much better then Tina when acting comes as she has shown variety in her performance and today bcoz of it her chemistry with gaurav has hooked viewers to uttaran I know I started watching Uttaran just because of Rathod and Tapasya to me they are as good as real and live. Such is the power of their talent. Whatever they do it comes from within and they are v v convincing.
i don't think that RD is much better than TD. i find both of them equal regarding their actings.RD's ckt in the show has more potential but that doesn't mean shes better than TD. its one's perception & likeness.though RD has gud chemistry wid GC but earlier TD's chemistry wid RK & even NS was much better than TD wid GC. and so many ppl started watching this crap after watching their chemistry also. so its not only u who started watching it after watching RD's chemistry wid GC but oders 've also started watching it after seeing TD's chemistry both wid NS & RK. so it depends upon one's likeness & perception abt acting!!
Besides, I don't believe and trust awards which only khans get even if they are duds. It's quite clear anything can be bought with money awards, media, etc etc. Everyone knows what sort of talents our dear bollywood khans have.