I totally disagree with u.Originally posted by: excelsa7
I disagree with you - I really don't think that she is a talented actrress at all- as that would mean that she could easily portray other roles except being a victim, sad and upset... and let's not forget self-righteous. For example she has failed miserably in acting a mother role!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SHe acted so well when she lost the baby - becasue it was not directly acting as a mother - but moreso AGAIN as a VICTIM!. She simply does not seem to be able to go beyond the victim/sad/crying role - she cannot portrray a mother role nor does she seem to be very good at comedy ... she cannot portray variety ... quite suprising that so many of you seem to hold her acting ability in such high esteem... really it is the chemistry between her and sushant as well as the storyline of PR that has led to her success thus far - and not so much her acting skills
If u cant connect with her acting skills no problem, for me when i c sachu and her, i c the mom-sos relation, for me she is a very talented and versatile actress.
I still stay by wt i have said earlier, she is a very talented actress
I feel she acts very naturally with sachu as a mother, i dnt c nanny in her, i get connectd with her portrayal of mother role to sachu. And finally thats wt matyters, v need to get connected with the character.
Moreover i watch this show only for her, i connect more with the role of archana.
Im surprised y arent u commenting anything on other character portrayals, i mean do u connect with savita as a grand mom? do u connect with manav as a father?
Everyone are bound to their opinions. So no offense.
For me she is indeed talented and versatile both.π
And bout comedy, i saw so improvement in her frm first epi til she left. She imrpoved alot. Surprisingly i liked her comedy bit as well
She gave her try in it, and she did improve on it and i give credit for that. π
comment:
p_commentcount