Originally posted by: chocolover89Shakti was just an awful film through and through. It would have failed regardless of who was in it IMHO.. I never managed to sit through that crap. I tried watching it for SRK and Karishma..couldn't.
I beg you to see the original. It is simply fantastic. It was so REAL and RAW, everything from the performances to the cast to the setting. It simpled failed to translate in the Hindi version.
Originally posted by: eraserIs Mickey Contractor his real name? Like the 'Contractor' bit?
and yeah right, Ash did not have any makeup on in Kajra re 😆
Originally posted by: VanityGirl
I beg you to see the original. It is simply fantastic. It was so REAL and RAW, everything from the performances to the cast to the setting. It simpled failed to translate in the Hindi version.
Originally posted by: Dexterphile@Vanity: Well you are. You started off in the first place by saying Aishwarya is the sole reason Bunty aur Babli worked. I countered that with the Shakti example. The fact is B&B was a hit and Shakti wasn't. The fact also is Aishwarya was an item girl in both. One worked but the other did not. So how can you positively give all the credit to her?
Originally posted by: chocolover89
The original is probably better, but Shakti left a real bad taste in my mouth..not sure if I want to see another version of it..
comment:
p_commentcount