Originally posted by muktha_cute
Nope . Wrong facts . If the property is ancestral , Tapasya has right on property . if she ever decides to contest her father . Has she claimed her share ? I do NOT see it . One has no way of knowing what the will is in which this large estate and business is managed . Wills r very complicated and so r Trusts .
If its only Jogi's , bequeathed to him in WILL by his dad , its only HIS . π Since both these cases we do not see , its safe to assume that Jogi nourished Icha with HIS wish and HIS money , Tapasya was not in the picture at all .
EXECUTION OF A WILL
- On the death of the testator, an executor of the will.
- The court will ask the other heirs of the deceased if they have any objections
to the will.
- If there are no objections, the court will grant probate.
- A
probate is a copy of a will, certified by the court. A probate is to be
treated as conclusive evidence of the genuineness of a will.
- In case any objections are raised by any of the heirs, a citation has to be
served, calling upon them to consent.
- This has to be displayed prominently in the court.
- Thereafter, if no objection is received, the probate will be granted.
- It is only after this that the will comes into effect.
if jogi writes a will
and if he gives his property 2 iccha or give half of his property 2 iccha though she doesnt comes in class 1/class 2 and still the original heir of the property taps from class 1 is alive.iccha cant get even a single penny out of the property
if taps the heir of jogis property will not raise any objection
then only the will is passed
if she goes into court against the will ,then will becomes void
[/QUOTE]
ohh samgh gaya par... tapasya never raise any objection against jogi if he wanted to surrender a whole property to ichcha...because she loves a lot...π