Originally posted by koolsadhu1000The story of Rupal Virani touches my heart and makes my blood boil .
rupal's story isn't heart felt as shes a selfish & she left her parents wen they needed her support alongwid their oder daughter!!
Manhar and Jyotsna constantly berate her and lay guilt trips on her as if she has done a BIG CRIME for having different goals ...other than being poor .
they don't berate her 4 having difft goals but the way hse'd chosen 2 achieve it & they also don't want 2 b poor as they r living quite welloff until IMV did this cheap 'harqat"!!
It seems wanting to be rich is a BIG CRIME in this serial . Wanting to be an entrepreneur is a sin . The professions that are 'GOOD" are ...teaching or becoming a 'SACHA" government official .
i think they'd shown that neither IMV's parents nor any oder member of their family thinks becuming rich is crime & they also never said that only teaching & govt job is gud but they want 2 b rich but wid morals & values still intact & rupal hasn't done such things!!
Rupal Virani dared to dream different . She faces the same fate IMV faced by his parents . Getting ostracized by family .
if IMV'd faced ostracization then his parents esply mother wud never'd sent him 2 mumbai even 4 a once!! so neither of them faced such things. rather both of them r selfish 2 the core & only thinks that being poor is a crime & poor deserved 2 b treated badly & its quite obvious from the recent epis also!!
Sonal's so called dream was supported tremendously by her parents . Yet they frown down on Rupal's dream of becoming a succesful businesswoman . Why ? Who says that one dream is noble and the other isn't ? Who decides that ? Manhar and Jyotsna ?
as i'd earlier said they didn't frown on her ambition of bcuming a successful business woman but bcoz of her selfishness. if she wanted 2 b a business woman she cud've done this evne by remaining wid her family rather wid her so-called moral uncle!!
Siddarth's dream of becoming an artist gets sympathy . But Rupal's ambition of doing something different from the life her family offered her is regarded as PAAP . Why ? Just like Sonal and Siddarth dreamed of something different inspite of being in a rich household , Rupal too dreamt something different inspite of having middle class values thrust on her all the time . Is that a crime ?
do u want 2 say that being middleclass & their values r worthless & only gaining wealth by any cheap means is sumthing 2 learn?? so is it a crime being a midlle class & having values??and if her parents want her 2 hav gud moral values then why don't they've the right wen similar logic is given wen any1 points finger 2wards IMV 4 being harsh & cruel 4 sid's dreams??why IMV has the right 2 think thta wats gud 4 his children but wen manhar or IMV's parents wants 2 hav gud moral values rather than being such a business tycoon widout morality they r condemnend!!
Her uncle offered her his guidanceand support . He was happy to groom her and she was happy to get groomed . Her parents could NEVER give her that exposure .Here a close relative from her immediate family was offering it to her , why shouldn't she take it ?
wat type of exposure had/have she got ?? she wasn't shown getting sum tips from IMV abt how 2 start even 4 once???wow wat a knowledge & experience shes getting!!
If Devki could take on BB's business and accept IMV as a guru by reading his books like Eklavya , why cannot Rupal take the opprtunities given to her ?
bcoz devki has her morals & values intact wid her alongwid the intelligence required 4 bcuming a business woman!! and rupal isn't shown doing anything apart sitting there comfortably!!
Devki's dream of becoming a succesful businesswoman was applauded by Manhar and Jyotsna . Why ? Was it LOVE for Devki ...a relatively unknown girl btw , or was it coz she was standing AGAINST IMV ?
same as above!! their luv 4 devki is due 2 her selfishlessness alongwid ambition 2 do sumthing!!
But the same Manhar and Jyotsna frown down on Rupal's dream , saying she is materialistic ! Why ? Coz she is not standing AGAINST IMV ?
rupal is materialistic unlike devki. and may b they also don't like her 2 support IMV as hes morally & legally a corrupt businessman 2 the core!! though almost all the business ppl r like this but still i hope sum of them hav sum of the morals wid them in reality!!
So Manhar and Jyotsna DO appreciate businesswomen , but only when they stand AGAINST IMV .
just bcoz hes ruthless & morally corrupt!!
Coz Devki is definetely pursuing a materialistic goal ...one doesn't want to take business to heights to become a SADHU .
but it doesn't mean 2 bcum ricj u've 2 bcum "shaitan"(devil or evil or dracula). u can still b gud human despite being so rich!!
Manhar and Jyotsna squirmed when Rupal left their house to join her Mota Kaka . But they have no problems instigating the bahu of MOta Kaka . In short , they have no qualms stirring trouble in MOTA KAKA"s household by pitting his bahu against him .
wat IMV has done till date?? didn't he try 2 lure/instigate sonal by buying a educn institution 2 teach her there!! and he'dn't done out of his nature 2 help her niece but rather 2 satisfy his big stupid ego & so-called honour & reputation!! manhar & jyotsna never instigated devki. but bcoz they finf her values match theirs they supported her unlike IMV who always employed evil methods!!and didn't spare even his DIL or Bro's family!!
So what shud Rupal do ? Leave her dream of becoming businesswoman and become munciplality school teacher like Sonal ?
so just 2 realize her dream she shud've left her parents in the time of need?? and is it bad 2 bcum a teacher & that 2 municipality teacher? then why do we ppl want 2 get educn. i think if IMv wansn't taught by the same municipality teacher he wudn't've even bcum able 2 reach 2 the so-called cheap midlle class!!
Undoubtedly teaching is a noble profession , one of the greatest .But is wanting to be a businesswoman any less noble ? Is wanting to be a share market genius or ruling the corporate world a crime ?
not a crime but defntly atleast 4 me its not among the noble profession if 2 bcum rich i've 2 cut oder's throats!! u needn't 2 cut the the oder line 2 shorten it but u need 2 draw bigger line than the oder1!!
Rupal has explained once that she did not come back only for the rich lifestyle .She came back to learn a lot from her uncle .
and wat she'd leran from him?? 2 cheat, try 2 murder by burning sum1's work place, 2 put ur own family members behind bars just bcoz it hurted ur stupid ego 4 not getting the contract, crushing ur children's dreams just bcoz u hate being poor or think oder professions lowly in comparison 2 being rich!!
What Manhar and Jyotsna have done by constantly rejecting her advances of love and laying sarcastic guilt trips on her is nothing short of MEAN and PETTY .
and they r doing right as shes mean & selfish. and why they shud accept her wen once she'd already rejected their values. just bcoz IMV is rich & a successful businessman he is right watever he do but bcoz manhar stands 4 values hes lowly & his ideals r outdated??
Was not Manhar staying under his rich brother''s roof for so many years ?
but he never joined his business & remained down 2 earth & he always uphold moral values!!
Did Manhar really follow government protocol to the hilt when he ran behind Devki huffing and puffing to tell her not to miss the meeting at the airport ? Was he apprising other applicants in this same way ?
that wasn't bcoz of govt protocol!! he did bcoz he knew IMV set up a plan 2 ger her out of his way!! and i m also in govt job & if sumhow if 1 of my family member or frnd didn't get such info where its not corrupt practice i wud'd also told& esply wen theres sum1 IMV like prsn is also involved. i wud like 2 give preference 2 devki like prsn & not 2 IMV!!
Seeing that two of his family members r in the bidding , Manhar cud have very well excused himself from the commitee saying it is inappropriate for him to be on this commitee as either decision he takes would reek of favoritsm .Did he do that ? Did he do the APROPRIATE SACHA thing ?
he did sacha thing!!its ur preception which is blinded by IMV's so-called hard work & richness!! and r u suggesting running away from the duty just bcoz ur family members r involved!! then i think all govt employees shud excused themselves wenever theres sum interviews etc. where their relatives or frnds r present!!
No . He stayed put and favoured the novice bahu as he too was itching to teach his arrogant brother a lesson .
then wats wrong if he wants 2 teach such an evil, egoistic & arrogant prsn a lesson!! but as manhar'd told IMV that it was the decision by whole commitee & not just his & even all liked devki's proposal more which was wid values & care abt so-called middleclass ppl travelling in planes who in IMV's view r not worth anything & esply wen he himself is there!!
We viewers know that IMV put Manhar in jail . But Jyotsna has no prrof . All she has is a suspicion . Yet she did not hesitate to give an interview to that tabloid journalist Viraj who is clearly doing YELLOW JOURNALISM .
if viraj is doing Yellow Journalism then wat iMV is doing in the name of business & giving such statements where hes not harming oder's but also his own family members!!! and jyotsna may not've roof but shes convinced & sumtimes wenever sum1 blame oder prsn he/she do this only on suspicion 1st & then try 2 get proofs & that 2 4 the satisfaction of law & society!!
He is using journalism fo a personal MAKSAD . Its not neutral at all , is it ? And journalists r not really supposed to do that .
and IMV is also doing cheap harqats of sending his own family members just 2 get a contract & he doesn't want 2 b defeated as it hurts his big stupid ego!!
what Viraj did was use the perfect opprtunity to reveal himself and use Jyotsna to get back at IMV .
so wat?? didn't IMV used/uses devki 2 get back at BB 4 his rejection of IMV 4 her daughter??why u ppl always justify IMV's acts which r clearly legally & morally corrupt & can't even consider them as a business tactics!!
He is as much a USER as IMV . And Jyotsna who flung Rupal out is NO LESS .
so wat?? IMV deserve such prsn & rupal also needed a flank as shes not gud daughter or even gud sis!! if she'd even 4 once tried 2 understand her parents or sis she wud've even got support from them 4 bcuming a succesful business woman!!
I don't approve of IMV's deeds but I feel zero sympathy for Manhar and especially Jyotsna .
these r the same line i m seeing in the UT forum abt taps deed. sorry i've 2 mention that forum here!!!
Edit Add : The episode yesterday showed that the slander articles were published without knowledge of Jyotsna or Sonal . So I take back that part . But I still maintain it was careless and thoughtless of Jyotsna to vent out with the door open . I felt extremely happy with Sonal for giving Viraj his due .
just bcoz IMV is so- called successful business man viraj's vendetta bcums sin & IMV's "punya"!! and now they shudn't vent out their anger. poor manhar & jyotsna who r not rich so their so-called cheap values & morals r not worth in front of IMV's blood stained money or status!!
and wudn't u'd done such thing if ur own family memeber was framed & u r fully convinced that its done by ur own oder family member!!why u r not happy wen Baa Or bapu give IMV his due by saying. then why u say they r wrong. now also sonal didn't say anything only bcoz of those values & morals which u r despicing!!