Originally posted by: desigal90Adios, tell me you saw,
Being CyrusOmkaraEk Hasina ThiParineetaJust these three films alone justify his talent.And he's JUST as convincing in his romantic roles like Hum Tum, and comic roles like DCH and KHNHMany appreciated his performance in Kurbaan and felt he was better than Kareena and Vivek. Even LAK was something different. And now Aarakshan and Agent Vinod.Here's one actor who doesnt get bogged down in one genre. He's proven it time and time again.
Originally posted by: desigal90There's a difference. When Eraser and Dexter criticize an actor, they do it because its their GENUINE opinion. You "bash" just to annoy members.
That's the difference.
Originally posted by: ladygagaAamir is the only superstar who makes an effort to act, others are just inconsistent and hardly take risks, or if they do take risks then the result is not always that great. SRK and Salman both were much better in the beginning, but later they started repeating themselves. SRK experimented successfully with Swades and CDI, but Salman stopped experimenting after Tere naam, which is quite sad. I still hope he atleast does one film with a director like Vishal bhardwaj or someone who can extract a non-superstarry kinda performance out of him, but it seems not many film makers are willing to take a risk with him and he himself will never have the courage to attempt something outside his comfort zone.
Why did you ignoreOriginally posted by: Sallufanno1i agree here.. saif isnt that good.. look what kinda filsm he didnt..
dil chahata hai confused loverhum tum .- confused loversalaam namaste - confused loverkal ho na ho - wierdohe used to be side hero in all akshay kumar movies in 90s REMEMBEReven a show wasnt completed if akshay kumar wasnt there when saif ali khan was thereyeh mere nahin - Mayur ke shabd hain who used to take interviews on zeetv uk
comment:
p_commentcount