Originally posted by jyoti06
Yesterday I was fine with Geet's decision to stay back and clear the issue ...my issue was the dialogue which she said in the end regarding her duties of a daughter which is bigger than a wife's duty..that dialgoue was not neededπ€...
But still I have a defence for her above dialogueπ...I feel Geet has already fulfilled her wife's duty by supporting the grt MSK in this Balwant lie and playing with the emotions of this Amritsar family even after the husband-wife patched upπ..Was it really necessary for MSK to keep acting as Balwant and keep lieing to all even after he patched up with his wife ??π€...In a way he was playing with the family's emotions by presenting his once upon a time rapist brother as her wife's husband ...right ??...But still Geet supported MSK in this lie as part of her wife's duty..Right ?
So today if she feels that she needs to fulfill her daughter's duty as well by staying back,then where is she wrong ?π€
Yes there was no need for her to do the comparison between both duties ...but that was the fault of the dialogue writer and not the characterπ
As character both MSK and Geet's character hv taken a beating with this whole lie game which they played...but that proves they both r human and not godπ
Thanks for that Jyo. I have always been a keen supporter of Geet. But the CVs are really playnig around with her character for sometime now. You said it all. The dialogue is what bothers me. I stand by her for staying abck and clearing things. But dialogue the words have been nagging me!