Is Tostay to be blamed in part for what happend?

I am not siding with what the Chaur's did, as they r completly out of line.  However in a way Tosty did dig her own grave.  I found it a bit uneasy that Tosty meets Malti and they click which is good, but how much she know about her to share all her problem and family info with her?  Its not like she knows Malti since childhood, so why share all this detailed information?

i get ur point but she was treating her like a sister...like nitika and smita

i do see spilling ur gutts to a stranger  abikt wierd

Well, sometimes women develop a friendship and get pretty close. It is like you click with others who are in the same wavelength. It is possible that Toasty and Malati felt that bond subconsciously.

I kind of agree...they did make the friendship transition go super fast rather than building it up. I know I don't open up that easily.

The only part I find Toasty lacking is not sharing  the details with Tej. Had she shared everything, she would not have lost his faith and also could find the true identity of Malti much earlier.

i disagree..  she really didn't share family secrets did she? She didnt talk about courtcase that pashu was fighting or anything. And sometimes it really takes only few meetings to form that bond and thats what happened with them. Also toasty didnt hide about the friendship with anybody in the family. Infact werent they suppose to meet the first time these guys went to the aayurvedic center? Its just the co-incidence(and drama that cvs wanted to create which is acceptable) that she didnt meet any of the family and in better circumstances.. 

What would have happened if  say instead of pashu, tej or say dadaji or even pitaji was introduced by toasty to malti? It would have been very clear that toasty didnt know who the malti was right?