India-Forums

   

Jai's note from facebook (Page 11)

ThatOneGuy IF-Sizzlerz
ThatOneGuy
ThatOneGuy

Joined: 05 April 2010
Posts: 11160

Posted: 21 May 2011 at 9:11pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by return_to_hades

Originally posted by Mihirism

Originally posted by return_to_hades

67% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

Debatable. 


Only 27% of statistics can be validly debated.

Only 15% of all statistics that can be validly debated make sense. 

petticoat IF-Stunnerz
petticoat
petticoat

Joined: 19 October 2006
Posts: 31655

Posted: 21 May 2011 at 9:14pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by Mihirism

Originally posted by bandicoot


the validity of the statistics that are made up is another question.

jai probably ended it after the quote. it however continues here.

6707 is still a biased number based on hw the data collection was made

few on IF or 6707 online data.. bad data is bad data


Yup you're right. Josh definitely has more fans but they refuse to vote for their team! Jalwa fans, on other hand, keeps voting through proxies ...WinkLOL


see this is the issue

here i am discussing the validity of your statistical claims and u jump into josh vs jalwa

pointless!

i never said that. misconstruing statements isnt funny in any way.

oh well i should knw who i am talking to

The following 2 member(s) liked the above post:

tawashereturn_to_hades

petticoat IF-Stunnerz
petticoat
petticoat

Joined: 19 October 2006
Posts: 31655

Posted: 21 May 2011 at 9:16pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by debayon

Sample representation doesn't make up for proper sampling procedures. So I'd go with Bandicoot Di on this one


thanks debayon

im not getting into the josh jalwa mess here

jalwa won. i would rather use the judges' scoring as a fitting measure than anything else.Smile

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

Chippeshwini

ThatOneGuy IF-Sizzlerz
ThatOneGuy
ThatOneGuy

Joined: 05 April 2010
Posts: 11160

Posted: 21 May 2011 at 9:18pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by bandicoot

Originally posted by Mihirism

Originally posted by bandicoot


the validity of the statistics that are made up is another question.

jai probably ended it after the quote. it however continues here.

6707 is still a biased number based on hw the data collection was made

few on IF or 6707 online data.. bad data is bad data


Yup you're right. Josh definitely has more fans but they refuse to vote for their team! Jalwa fans, on other hand, keeps voting through proxies ...WinkLOL


see this is the issue

here i am discussing the validity of your statistical claims and u jump into josh vs jalwa

pointless!

i never said that. misconstruing statements isnt funny in any way.

oh well i should knw who i am talking to

Ummm voting for contestants done through the show has voluntary bias too. That way almost all statistics are flawed. 

thanks for the personal attack though..was expecting it sooner or later...i should know who i am talking to.
petticoat IF-Stunnerz
petticoat
petticoat

Joined: 19 October 2006
Posts: 31655

Posted: 21 May 2011 at 9:21pm | IP Logged
^play victim now sure


the phone voting is less biased than the online polling because it is advertised every week in the show FYI

and i do not claim any statistically valid replies. u posted one i refuted that. that is all there is to it.

good day


Edited by bandicoot - 21 May 2011 at 9:21pm
ThatOneGuy IF-Sizzlerz
ThatOneGuy
ThatOneGuy

Joined: 05 April 2010
Posts: 11160

Posted: 21 May 2011 at 9:24pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by bandicoot

^play victim now sure


the phone voting is less biased than the online polling because it is advertised every week in the show FYI

and i do not claim any statistically valid replies. u posted one i refuted that. that is all there is to it.

good day

So what, its biased anyway..im gonna quote yourself here..."bad data is bad data" Wink


return_to_hades IF-Sizzlerz
return_to_hades
return_to_hades

Joined: 18 January 2006
Posts: 24756

Posted: 21 May 2011 at 9:25pm | IP Logged
Mihir, I think you misconstrued what Bandicoot said. She was merely debating the veracity of online poll statistics. It was unfair of you to bring up Josh/Jalwa comparison into the matter because she was not alluding to anything related to the teams at all. Her arguments would be valid if it was an online poll between apples and mangoes too.

This is why fans can be difficult to deal with sometimes, even neutral points are construed in a way to favor one side or another.

The following 1 member(s) liked the above post:

petticoat

petticoat IF-Stunnerz
petticoat
petticoat

Joined: 19 October 2006
Posts: 31655

Posted: 21 May 2011 at 9:27pm | IP Logged
^
for the last time!
bad data is definitely bad data.

the results were not based on statistical data

the results were based on cumulative discrete scoring on a scale of 1-10 by each of the judges present for each of the performances on stage.

by that information, jalwa won

not some fancy bad statistics


the bad statistics were what u brought into the picture



Go to top

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category / Channels
Forums

Lux Dance ke Superstars Topic Index

  • Please login to check your Last 10 Topics posted

Check these Celebrity also

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.

Popular Channels :
Star Plus | Zee TV | Sony TV | Colors TV | SAB TV | Life OK

Quick Links :
Top 100 TV Celebrities | Top 100 Bollywood Celebs | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Forum Index