So did it happen? - Page 25

Originally posted by: -pixie-

Maybe she wasn't happy with MSK's (non)-performance?

Or she'd had enough of his (non)-performance?

Originally posted by: -pixie-

Maybe she wasn't happy with MSK's (non)-performance?

Originally posted by: -pixie-

Not a single piece of clothing was astray 😳 *cough*

Maan had more clothes on in the morning than the night before (A red shirt and a red turban- where did he pack these clothes- I need to learn more about this invisible suitcase😆)

The case is yet not settled, milord! May I request that you ponder over the facts of the case once more 😆😳

I say we wait and talk about this in a week off 2... then we will know if con happened or not...

Originally posted by: hegdemedha

Or she'd had enough of his (non)-performance?

@ Shali: Hi

@ Shradha: I still can't like you.  Please edit the reasons for arguments in favour and against, when you have the time.

@ all: Have to leave now  .. see you around later.
Edited by hegdemedha - 12 years ago

Originally posted by: jyoti06

From my side a strict NO😛...I din't see anything in the morning which can suggest me something happened😛...

Also in yesterday's epi MSK still looked despo for a kiss while Geet is pushing him away which is abnormal especially if u hv done the deed last night itself😆😆

You can't be sure that IT'S not happened, just on the basis that M wanted a kiss. Maybe he enjoyed THE KISS that WE never got to see and wants more and more of the same. It obviously was a moreish one, seems so from his expression (unless we've got the expression all wrong)!
 Who knows, it's all like the emperor's new clothes to me. But then am I bovvered to quote a famous lady!
Edited by Murlal - 12 years ago

Originally posted by: shali

everyone is here...

no wonder den is empty...

Originally posted by: Soapoperasrfun

Shradha, I hope for Maan's sake that it is that, non-performance 🤣