Thanks for getting my point...Originally posted by: MrManagement
I agree that 7-8 marks is barely anything because there were five judges. If the finale only had two judge and Jalwa won by 7-8 points that would be big but that did not happen.
Thanks for getting my point...Originally posted by: MrManagement
I agree that 7-8 marks is barely anything because there were five judges. If the finale only had two judge and Jalwa won by 7-8 points that would be big but that did not happen.
ummm how do you have Josh winning 3 weeks? So you're saying Zee execs who pump millions of dollars in these shows can't do their math correctly? How could Josh have won last week? They lost? Going by your logic, Jalwa could have won the weeks they lost too? Jalwa beat Josh fair and square... Why shouldn't the judges equalize the score? Jai broke a rule, one can't stop in the middle of the performance no matter what, that's a rule...why should Jai get consideration for that? He broke a rule... Jalwa is the better team in this competition as proven by the results... If you don't think so, go set up another competition for them to compete in, but until then the facts are the one show that they competed head to head in, DID 2 outperformed DID 1...π No amount of excuse making will change that...π Truth, Humility, and most importantely Talent won in the long run...π Go Team JalwaOriginally posted by: MrManagement
This is a competition and one team had to win I don't know why your bring "truth" in all your posts.Your post make it seem that no one in DID 1 was truthful or had any humility. I think both teams were good and Josh deserved to win as much as Jalwa did. In the last six weeks Josh won 3 while jalwa only won twice if you included the finale. Josh might have won last week also becasue they were ahead by four points before the takkar. So also don't get how is DID2 ahead of DID in all waysππ if the judges had not equaled the scores there is no way DID 2 could have wonπ² I congratulate DID 2 for their victory, but there victory does not prove they are better than DID 1, if they would have won most of the weeks they I would admit they were the better team but as you can see that is not the case.
Originally posted by: MrManagement
I agree that 7-8 marks is barely anything because there were five judges. If the finale only had two judge and Jalwa won by 7-8 points that would be big but that did not happen.
π Glad for Jalwa win...Jalwa had the talent, the humility, and the character that best represents DID...π I wonder what Prince, Sid, and Jai have to say about this victory? There was a lot of talk done by these 3 contestants about how much better they were then DID 2 and how they would easily win and how DID 2 weren't even deserving to be on the same stage as them...π We have Prince who cost his team the finale by forgetting his dance steps, and we have Jai who cost his team a shot at last week by breaking the rules of the show...π So 2 of the people who did most of the bashing wound up being served huge slices of humble pie...Karma is great...what goes around comes around...π Prince was telling DID 2 contestants to practice and turns out he is the one that needed the practice...forgetting his steps in the finale...π awesome
Originally posted by: ankit_nyc
π Yeah that's right when Jalwa wins by 7-8 points it's not a big deal, but when Josh wins by a point or two like they did in 2 of the episodes that means everything...π
It was never a BIG DEAL, who said it was a big deal when Josh won by few points. It's a reply to the topic starter who thinks it's a big deal and is quite astonished without doing the math.Originally posted by: ankit_nyc
π Yeah that's right when Jalwa wins by 7-8 points it's not a big deal, but when Josh wins by a point or two like they did in 2 of the episodes that means everything...π
comment:
p_commentcount