with UT I would say unless we hear both side of the story we can not only judge Rathore or accuse him of Rape, a lot is debatable...the problem with Taps character is she never speaks the truth only half the truth...Taps character has said "I can go to any extent to get Veer"...benefit of doubt should go for both not just TapsOriginally posted by: SRKLuvrFriends I would really like if you would read this its a case that is going on in the courts here in Melbourne and it is exactly remniscient of what happened with Tapasya and Rathod in Uttaran! So do read it and tell me what you think😊
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/rape-laws-fury/story-e6frf7jo-1226075258315
Isnt this exactly like Tapasya and Rathods case? Rathore goes near Tapasya when she is in a drunken state but she pushes him away and rejects his advances and says im gonna sleep. Then when she is asleep Rathore just creeps onto her and she doesnt even realise it. That constitutes rape because she clearly had pushed him away b4hand.
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slb-WZW5-Hw[/YOUTUBE]
Now see here at 1:17 she is clearly pushing him away and rejecting hi coming close to her. So legally...this constitutes rape.
comment:
p_commentcount