Do you recognise Pratigya? - Page 2

Originally posted by: tanthya

BINGO !!! 😆😆😆😆

Edited by kEEnkEEn - 12 years ago

Originally posted by: kEEnkEEn

 

If what they say is true, being a pro-women, woman-centric show - the bunsen burner wont be K

 

The only other possible option is GD

 

I repeat - K's BB needs re-fuelling - he's firing blanks at present...  ... pun intended ? 😉😳 😆

Originally posted by: yemi3006

Originally posted by: a_uma

Well... Bunsen burner is already there... but CVs are not using him effectively...😉😳😆😆

@kEEnkEEn : she is a good DIL .bec she respects amma n SS whatever crap they throw at her n even after the face blackening incident which was inhuman n barbaric to the core   but not compromising on her dignity n self respect n what is right ...n urges K to respect them ..she even gives respect to sakthi n stops K whenever he raises his hand on KN ...she has given K numerous chances again n again even after repeated lies n break of trust...has put her life in line just so that he don't go to jail n given hhm sound support n advice whenever he was on the right path n was not lying to her...she has saved his honor by giving her 1st salary to his family in his name thus saving his ill father...n not to mention what she has done for kesar...more over she is a normal woman who gets angrx, hurt and happy accordingly

Honest piece of writing. I am a big fan of your in your face candour. IMO, just as perfectionism is an euphemism for being critical, is rigid idealism an expression of arrogance ? Something like my values are better than yours, otherwise how do we explain P's tacit support for Arushi and Shyamu when he flexed his muscles against Angad.

Originally posted by: sarcozee

Honest piece of writing. I am a big fan of your in your face candour. IMO, just as perfectionism is an euphemism for being critical, is rigid idealism an expression of arrogance ? Something like my values are better than yours, otherwise how do we explain P's tacit support for Arushi and Shyamu when he flexed his muscles against Angad.

Originally posted by: kEEnkEEn

Hey Sarcozee - great post! Come more often!👏👍🏼

I totally agree as you put it so bluntly...and P's body language and general rigidity supports the notion entirely ...

Does Prefessorwa have any muscles to flex? and that too against Angad?

See I never really understood this...does this mean people think Professorwa actually murdered Angad? 

I never looked at it this way...I just saw it that Professorwa made a decision not to save him...is this murder? Intent? He didnt actually cause Angad to slip did he?

As for Pratigya - she is blind to her family's faux pas which is fine if youre a realist but not if you claim to be idealist. Having said that she seems to be inher idealist mode when talkin to and about her brother...

Wouldnt itbe funny if Adarshwa turned out to be adopted after all!!!😆 

😆😆😆😆😆And Krishna in TN...😆.😆😆
😆😆😆

Originally posted by: ramanbabitha

😆And Krishna in TN...😆.😆😆
😆😆😆

Originally posted by: sarcozee

Honest piece of writing. I am a big fan of your in your face candour. IMO, just as perfectionism is an euphemism for being critical, is rigid idealism an expression of arrogance ? Something like my values are better than yours, otherwise how do we explain P's tacit support for Arushi and Shyamu when he flexed his muscles against Angad.

Bravo! Bull's Eye! 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏  Please keep posting your thoughts. 😃