Originally posted by: omarnaeem
Jee nehruji π
Originally posted by: Dexterphile
Lets put it this way, if SRK was the rapist, he would be given a second chance because he draws audience to the theatre. So producers will invest money in SRK whether he is a rapist or a murderer. Simple business strategy. Shiny won't get a second chance because he can't pull audience to the theatre. So whether he is guilty or innocent, his acting career is over, there's no resurrection for him.
Originally posted by: ladygaga
And are you the keeper of truth?? How do you know what you believe is true, but what the opposing party is believing is false. Beleiving your version of truth and deriding other's opinion or version of truth is also hypocricy.. its hypocricy, its being biased and its being inflexible.
Originally posted by: Nuktaacheen
well put...! of course, he would get away... srk also falls under the same category as salman, doesn't he... both A listers, and actors who have connections...! ππ everyone will be claiming how it was the maid who did this for 'publicity'...!suku, i am not implying that "my" version is correct, or "yours" is incorrect... certain actors will be condemned because of their guilt, and certain actors just won't be, no matter how much their actions suggest the obvious... that's just a fact... i know it, you know it... everyone else knows it... they may say it or not...! πππthe question of biasness, hypocrisy does not arise UNTIL people choose to make distinction between actors (based on your preference), it'll automatically comes into play...inflexible...? what's there to be flexible about...? be partial towards people who have a golden heart, and be impartial towards those i suspect have hearts of ice...? πππ
comment:
p_commentcount