Originally posted by: smrth
Some of the interpretations on Savita's anger have beaten me dumb. The stretched logic so amazing, it makes me wonder whether it's ok to point out the anomaly. Especially when so many perceptive readers are seemingly agreeing to it wholeheartedly- I must be missing' and ennui. For a change I'll speak ' The Fandom for Archu wHATEVER RUBBISH she does beats us dumb too samarth . The worship of a silly character like Archu is done by various intellectuals too .Chalta hai .π
A.) 'Savita's anger because of divorce'- Of all people who has the least right or reason to give vent to a righteous and disapproving rage, it's her. Divorce was acted upon to secure Sachin (rightly or wrongly). The divorcees were deeply in love and not irreparably acrimonious. And see the effect. Sachin was born in Savita's household, not lost to her and ultimately she had that ample chance to raid and rob his departing mother. For Savita everything had boiled down to Sachin- at any cost, as clearly seen at time of Shravni's release on Manav. She no longer cared whether Shravni stays or goes; only Sachin must stay'Now we apply righteousness borne out of her briefly just support for Armaan or her forbiddance to divorce. Why, then on what premise her present anger is rooted? The divorce got nullified and her just wish prevailed- where is the need to go angry now? (But even Cvs' have forgotten this angle perhaps).Anger is NOT bcoz of Divorce . Anger is coz Archana goes and comes AS SHE WISHES . The Sachu point is totally irrelevant here . Archana went by not listening to ANYONE . She went similiarly on Satyanarayan day too . Then suddenly she came in a WEDDING saying Hey ! U know what ? I want Manav NOW ! Love Him ! Realised that ! U guys dont mind I hope ! Meanwhile her insufferable family goes on insulting SIMPLE SIMON ........her son Manav . Btw the stupid second marraige has been done on a beach . WITH NO WITNESSES . Archana like Vaishu shud go and CHECK if she is REALLY married .
B.) Anger due to Second Jailing- Again unconvincing logic. She would be righteously angry on Dharmesh-Jaywant, or even Karanjikars (their twin faults- 'relationship' or at worse 'inaction', though faults untenable for a 'righteous' anger)'But Archana should be the person she ought to be thankful to. It was she, who, with complete indifference to personal ruin had actually secured Manav's freedom and stood by them fast, actually earning the wrath of her entire clan. How could be she get angry on her on this point rather then thankful? Goes over me. U mean to say Savita ought to be GRATEFUL to Archana coz she SAVES Manav each time her family FIRST imprisons him or INSULTS him ? So FIRST they will IMPRISON or INSULT rottenly and THEN Archana will SAVe and She shud be HAPPY or GRATEFUL to Archana for the scenario ? Who LATKOFIES him ? HER family .Who SAVES him ? SHE , naturally .See the connection ? Shud this BUG the hell out of her by making her feel GOOd or Not , ENOUGH of this girl .........or shud this make her GRATEFUL ? UNCONVINCING LOGIC to me !
These and Savita's earlier complete acceptance of that 'baggage' (for Sachin's death) makes whole 'Angry Aai on a baggage' track moot...Stretched artificiality for the sake of stretching only, as is their wont. Or on alternative, to cash well on Usha Nadkarni's versatility in portraying varying shades of a senior character'Better they wrap up this dubious track and show her happy and reconciled.Are u saying Archana has no BAGGAGE ? We differ !
This is only a tale related perspective.
comment:
p_commentcount