Is Age a decisive factor in choosing New Talents??
Do you like this article?
|User Rating||(14 Votes)|
|*Shruti*, jazzy28, Manshaa3, nabz8888, kggk_fan01, -Krupa-, o|oNaTaShAo|o, smallwonder, Anuradha, Anastacia, scarletteblue, -DulceMaria-, SaaraCOMB, umi82990|
whats wrong in dat
hey i feel richja was damn gud.
infact its was tht childlike think in her voice tht was attractive.
she had a very pure flowing singin
n well if richa is 16 as all r shoutin
wht abt ankita who is 17 n many r 18 not much diff....
so how can u stop 16 yr olds ...
becos nt all 16 yr olds hv such voices .
infact rarely dey hv immature voices.
n i think its richas' looks(kidddy kinds)
n nt her voice which gt her out ...
becos whenever judges luked at her dey felt a kid a singing...
Richa was very gud as far technicality was concerned. She cud sing v well in sur, perhaps even btr than the other contestants and took harkats and other stuff v wonderfully. Its not her fault tat her voice is immature. The judges shud'v thought abt this earlier in the theatre rnd as now she cant participate in II again.
Even at the age of 16, there are voices which are matured but few like in case of Richa suffer in the hands of these age factors.. So, to solve this problem we can always have one more category called as the sub junior and can be declared that those who are winners of this sub junior contest will get the privilege of being an wild card entry participant when it comes to senior level.. In this way even the education does not suffer
abhaas got fantastic comments from the judges.'arey yeh tho wonder boy hai they exclaimed..yeh voice of india hi nahi..i forget the rest..but i rest my case..
reality music shows without 17/18 year old hemu,nihira,himani,vinit,arijit,ishmeet,abhilasha,vipul..borringgg
TV stars made their presence felt at the success bash of the 10th ... 156
A lot of drama is waiting ahead for the viewers in Star Plusâ€™ ... 61
Views : 16181
Views : 3283