Joined: 22 September 2004
Very well said Jeni and Puja…..everyone has been extremely mature and have presented their thoughts very well….
I agree with Jeni in that abortion is not a sin if performed for the right reasons, which to me are only if the mother thinks that she is endangering her life. A conscious person has every right to make decision regarding her life but not that of another being…..abortions for any other reason are more for convenience and yes I would consider them a sin then….
Many people think that it is better to abort a child who has genetic disorders….I disagree with this…..I don't think anyone has the right to play God with a another being….my family friend's unborn baby was diagnosed with some sort disorder that the doctors said would give it very little chance of survival and she had the option of aborting the baby. Needless to say she was shattered but still refused the abortion. Her baby was born healthy…..the docs later found out that her reports had been changed with that of another lady….
To make a long story short, to me abortion in this case meant that u were losing hope….that u have no faith in the Being who u r asking aid from…..every individual bring in the world their own fate…..to abort a child today because one thinks she lacks the basic amenities only to have hit the jackpot in a Lotto the next day….the parents, jobs, people do not provide for a child, God does….I believe that there is so much one does not know so how can we make a right decision based on incomplete knowledge…
Joined: 17 October 2004
truely said by gigli.
a kid by rape maybe aborted as it may remind her of the incident but i think if parents cant afford a childs future they should take certain measures to avoid concieving and am sure u all know there are many ways to do tht. cos abortion not only means killing an innocent being but killing it mercilessly. am sure if u pple knew how they abort a baby u wud agree with me, it gives u goosebumps. my cousin is a gynae in UK and once we were discussing this same topic when she told me how bad it is and some doctors actually cry while doing it. they burn the baby some how inside the womb or else one by one break every limb of the baby and remove it... ok some cases are such tht before concieving the parents are ready but after thr are some complications in tht matter i wud say they shud realise it in the first one and a half month of the pregnancy as the foetus does not really develop into a living being by then after tht i wud say it is a BIG sin.
in the end i wud only say 'yes a womens body is hers and she has every right to do wht she wants with it'... but before doing anything she shud once sit and think whether she is ready to have a kid or not if not then there are other measures to avoid getting pregnant. ofcourse am keeping the rape cases aside thts a completely another thing.
Joined: 27 November 2004
Joined: 09 January 2005
Abortion as an issue has both negatives and positives. I don't think I need to mention them again as you have already written a lot of excellent stuff on it above.
From my piece of mind, I think that though a woman has a right over her own body, a new born child is not a property to be eliminated or governed. It is a union of 2, and as such, the darker sex has a right too in the matter (except in rape cases).
Therefore, I firmly believe that all abortions should be preceded by a counselling session of both parents and the necessary act should be decided upon by the counsellor in cases as under, analyzing the situation.
Rape births-(In this case only the mother should have a say in the matter)
Children with serious deformities
Serious risk to the life of the mother
Apart from these, cases of premarital pregnancies should be handled sensitively and in the presence of both individuals. Both should have an equal say in the matter. If abortion is decided upon after a sonography, the counsellor must consult the doctor whether the foetus is suffering from a deformity or disease, or whether it is a gender-termination case. If so, the parents must be penalised and the abortion condemned.
In a nutshell, the cause for the abortion must be known in black and white before it is carried out.
Joined: 16 January 2005
I agree with Jen!
Joined: 16 January 2005
Joined: 08 November 2004
Thanks for opening this forum to yet another discussion.
I agree with almost all the comments above - Abortion is a tool, if used in the right cases such as rape victims or health concerns (of a baby or a mother), is extremely valuable. However, the choice should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
If a woman choses to have one, for whatever her reasons may be, I do not think anyone else has a right to judge her. She and her alone will face the consequenses, physical or emotional, as may be the case.
I disagree with the logic of killing of a 'living'. How is killing of 'unborn' and 'unwanted' living being different than killing animals for various reasons? Afterall, we learn that animals have souls, too.
Joined: 23 August 2004
|Topics||Topic Starter||Replies||Views||Last Post|
|Life and taking a life - when moral, when immoral?||Beyond_the_Veil||76||3137||12 October 2009 at 11:23pm
|Immoral to preach what one lacks?||raj5000||66||2223||28 June 2007 at 5:27pm
|False Sales Pitch - JOB or IMMORAL?||raj5000||14||834||05 April 2007 at 10:41pm
|Should we ban abortions?||breathing_irony||43||1922||23 March 2007 at 1:23pm