Originally posted by: return_to_hades
The thing is that social conventions are determined by the morality of the society as a whole. Consequently social conventions themselves influence morality. rather it should be the otherway round.. morality should influence social convention....
Whether lying is wrong or not is a moral principle. When the Russian lies to save face or the Japanese is not honest about poor performance they have altered this moral principle to their society. The definitions of lying, the moral issues encompassing lying have been altered giving way to these social conventions. On the other hand there are societies that have different views of lying and feel that cover up to save face is immoral. Lying is wrong.. thats the bottom line.. the semantic and situational justification for anything is not going to establish anything.. When you say everything is fair in war.. Still we set up rules dont we...so violation of a moral principle in world is not lack of compliance but an attempt to aberrate...from the norm
I am not trying to deny that there are basic moral principles. However, the point I want to make is that these principles are not rigid but very flexible guidelines. They are adaptable to society and situations. Not really. Guideline unless adhered to is loose way of allowing individual actions to define a rule..which is never the case.. Adhering to guidelines in the subsequent mandate.. .so Its essential, however you interpret.. it should have strong adherence...
Take the moral principle 'one must return what is borrowed'. Yes i borrow kleenex I woudl surely return it if the person wants it back... ππHowever, if we borrowed a piece of paper to write on, we do not feel obligated to return a piece of paper back. If one borrowed a car, then we expect it be returned. When we borrow books, games etc how soon we return it depends on our relationship with that person. If we borrow small amounts of money like a few quarters for soda or laundry it completely depends on our relationship with people if we ever return it and how soon. What you are saying is the cost of replacing what was borrowed.. that doesnt change the basic principle.. If a wife doesnt scream rape an forcing husband (though not a hurting one, who leaves bruises or physically hurts her) cant be indicted, even otherwise...
Whether it is a major decision or simple things in life moral principles adapt to people and situation. I am not saying morality should be twisted for personal purposes, but what is right and acceptable may well and truly vary and the person adapts to it. Moral issues are always more evident when seen in bigger issues but not so in case of smaller ones.. that doesnt yet establish non-compliance..
comment:
p_commentcount