Harry Potter

   

Final Potter movie split into two-Article (Page 3)

Post Reply New Post

Page 3 of 5

Page 1 Page 2
Page   of 5
Page 4 Page 5

tukz_REmix

IF-Rockerz

tukz_REmix

Joined: 18 April 2007

Posts: 6160

Posted: 15 March 2008 at 5:52am | IP Logged
Originally posted by *Jane*

Originally posted by tukz_REmix

its gud dat dere wont b 2 much cuttin shuttin but....splitin dem wil b same na...i mean den wont leave a movi in d mid-stroy n cont frm dere wid d oder....dey wil hav 2 shw frm d beginin...n den dey hav 2 ccut scenes....1 scene frm here n nxt frm dere Ouch

We don't know how they plan on showing this when it comes out. It could be possible that they will show it back to back. Only problem would be that theater goers will probably need to pay for two movies regardless of them being one movie, just split in two. It also means longer time spent in the theaters if they plan on doing this back to back. Maybe they could do some sort of discount...

We'll just have to wait and see how they plan on setting this up.

i dont htnk dey wil do dis......den dere wil a gud amnt of loss....n ppl wil bored u no......dey hav 2 w8 full 1 yr 2 c d remainin half prt of d film...n it wil  b irritating...so i thnk it wil b oder way round

Dear Guest, Being an unregistered member you are missing out on participating in the lively discussions happening on the topic "Final Potter movie split into two-Article (Page 3)" in Harry Potter forum. In addition you lose out on the fun interactions with fellow members and other member exclusive features that India-Forums has to offer. Join India's most popular discussion portal on Indian Entertainment. It's FREE and registration is effortless so JOIN NOW!

Zunny

Senior Member

Zunny

Joined: 20 December 2007

Posts: 940

Posted: 15 March 2008 at 6:35pm | IP Logged
Thanks for the info!

vrits

Senior Member

vrits

Joined: 28 February 2008

Posts: 351

Posted: 15 March 2008 at 9:10pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by stranger@mirror

Originally posted by vrits

Originally posted by lucky_lakshmi

hey I never knew this..really??? Interesting..Hope they do it fine..But splitting it up Confused Ouch
But they had better release quickly coz Pottermania will soon wear off...

i dont think it wud wear off that soon....maybe when all the movies hv been released and there are no more surprises and mention of hp...it wont wear off atleast be4 the last movie is released....ppl wud b stil expecting sumthing so there wud b sum amount of excitementSmile

But people who loves HP will definitely read the books...so there is a possibilty that this potter mania might wear off.Ouch

i did not get yr pointSmile

jenish.jariwala

Newbie

jenish.jariwala

Joined: 28 September 2006

Posts: 9

Posted: 15 March 2008 at 10:12pm | IP Logged
Evil Smile

*Jane*

Senior Member

*Jane*

Joined: 25 October 2004

Posts: 479

Posted: 25 March 2008 at 11:11pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by tukz_REmix

Originally posted by *Jane*

Originally posted by tukz_REmix

its gud dat dere wont b 2 much cuttin shuttin but....splitin dem wil b same na...i mean den wont leave a movi in d mid-stroy n cont frm dere wid d oder....dey wil hav 2 shw frm d beginin...n den dey hav 2 ccut scenes....1 scene frm here n nxt frm dere Ouch

We don't know how they plan on showing this when it comes out. It could be possible that they will show it back to back. Only problem would be that theater goers will probably need to pay for two movies regardless of them being one movie, just split in two. It also means longer time spent in the theaters if they plan on doing this back to back. Maybe they could do some sort of discount...

We'll just have to wait and see how they plan on setting this up.

i dont htnk dey wil do dis......den dere wil a gud amnt of loss....n ppl wil bored u no......dey hav 2 w8 full 1 yr 2 c d remainin half prt of d film...n it wil  b irritating...so i thnk it wil b oder way round

Actually, the loss could come from them doing it an year or so later. In the excitement of it all, some people like to see it all in one sitting. If they release them at the same time, people can choose to see it right then or choose to see the other part later. Doing it an year after the first part could have some audiences who went the first time 'round to skip the second part 'cause some just want to see it and move on, not having to remember nor having to rewatch the first part to know the flow of the second part. Of course, this is a corporate choice and they could go either way. Personally, I rather they release it at the same time. That way people have a choice in the seeing it now or later. Either way the movie makers are going to get their revenue.



Edited by *Jane* - 25 March 2008 at 11:14pm

simpleL0VE38

Goldie

simpleL0VE38

Joined: 11 July 2007

Posts: 1948

Posted: 26 March 2008 at 10:38pm | IP Logged
Thanks for the info!

tukz_REmix

IF-Rockerz

tukz_REmix

Joined: 18 April 2007

Posts: 6160

Posted: 26 March 2008 at 11:35pm | IP Logged
Originally posted by *Jane*

Originally posted by tukz_REmix

Originally posted by *Jane*

Originally posted by tukz_REmix

its gud dat dere wont b 2 much cuttin shuttin but....splitin dem wil b same na...i mean den wont leave a movi in d mid-stroy n cont frm dere wid d oder....dey wil hav 2 shw frm d beginin...n den dey hav 2 ccut scenes....1 scene frm here n nxt frm dere Ouch

We don't know how they plan on showing this when it comes out. It could be possible that they will show it back to back. Only problem would be that theater goers will probably need to pay for two movies regardless of them being one movie, just split in two. It also means longer time spent in the theaters if they plan on doing this back to back. Maybe they could do some sort of discount...

We'll just have to wait and see how they plan on setting this up.

i dont htnk dey wil do dis......den dere wil a gud amnt of loss....n ppl wil bored u no......dey hav 2 w8 full 1 yr 2 c d remainin half prt of d film...n it wil  b irritating...so i thnk it wil b oder way round

Actually, the loss could come from them doing it an year or so later. In the excitement of it all, some people like to see it all in one sitting. If they release them at the same time, people can choose to see it right then or choose to see the other part later. Doing it an year after the first part could have some audiences who went the first time 'round to skip the second part 'cause some just want to see it and move on, not having to remember nor having to rewatch the first part to know the flow of the second part. Of course, this is a corporate choice and they could go either way. Personally, I rather they release it at the same time. That way people have a choice in the seeing it now or later. Either way the movie makers are going to get their revenue.

hmm rite...i htnk u  rte dere

Beyond_the_Veil

IF-Sizzlerz

Joined: 12 February 2008

Posts: 11596

Posted: 27 March 2008 at 9:57am | IP Logged
THE ACCOUNT OF THE MEMBER WHO POSTED THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY BANNED.

If you think this is an error please Contact us.

Post Reply New Post

Go to top

Related Topics

  Topics Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
Harry Potter Picture Gallery 2 -NO COMMENTS

2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 84 85

ammmu 674 80557 11 April 2014 at 9:41pm
By pinguunique
harry potter behind the magic saiba007 0 899 02 December 2009 at 9:41am
By saiba007
Video: Wizarding World of Harry Potter commercial daniel_4ever 0 496 26 November 2009 at 10:05am
By daniel_4ever
potter-weasely or potter-granger

2 3 4 5 6 7

ishu124 52 8159 09 October 2005 at 10:25pm
By Morning Raaga
Critics split on new Harry Potter cdesai12 0 465 17 July 2005 at 12:05pm
By cdesai12

Forum Quick Jump

Forum Category

Active Forums

Harry Potter Topic Index

Limit search to this Forum only.

 

Disclaimer: All Logos and Pictures of various Channels, Shows, Artistes, Media Houses, Companies, Brands etc. belong to their respective owners, and are used to merely visually identify the Channels, Shows, Companies, Brands, etc. to the viewer. Incase of any issue please contact the webmaster.