DOTW-Umpire Vs Team!

Hi Cric Fans!!!

   Today's hot topic in every newspaper and Tv channels is whether we should play with or witout umpires..because it seems lyke that umpires cannot make a good judgement and most of the time they favour English or Austrailian teams..Now i wanna remind you all about the oval incident where for the first time an umpire was alleged of rasicm..There is no doubt that sometimes it's not easy to quickly make the right decision..Although in this case cameras gives u a clear evidence of who was out or who wasn't.. Now what you and doesn't understand is why the umpires deliberately favoured austrailian team?...

 So here are the questions  which has raised eyebrows of many cricket  fans

What do you think about umpire's role in cricket?

Why most of the teams are not satisfy with umpire's decision?

 Do you think that umpires should immediatly refer to third umpire if they are in a doubt?

Why the ICC doesn't take strict action against umpires?

Do you believe that steve buknor was favouring aussies in this test match series?If yes then state your reason

And  at the end i want to ask you that how deeply does this effect sportsmanship of players of any side?

to teh answer 2 yr questions

1)umpires' role is a very important one is they r fair..coz if tehy r nt fair enough the way v saw in the sydney test then i think this can lead 2 a lot of things..

2)most of teh team's r nt satisfied coz they definately dob't want any desicion 2 go aganist them..the umpire's have 2 b fair..

3)defiantely..if tehy r in doubt n tehy r asking 2 the firlders then y nt ask the batsman..this is ridiculous..

4)coz umpir's favous aussies the most as v have seen n the ICC president is unfortuntely an aussie..

5)tehre were 10 desicions agnst the indians..does steve bucknor think teh viewer's r blind or wat..i believe this test match sould now b announced as drwn coz its totally unfair..the was symonds patted on bucknor's back when he gave rahul out in teh 4th innings is clearly giving us a reason tht how did aussie win the world cup 3 times consecqtively..

thsi definately effects teh spotmanship coz if teh umpires r nt fair then the opposite team would think wats the use of playing when v knw whos gonna lose.i think aussie players r nt menly enough 2 face there defeat..even gals can face a defeat better than them yaar.they should wear skirts n take thier bats n balls n stay in the house itslef..even after winning teh test match they r complete LOSERS!!!

What do you think about umpire's role in cricket?

Their role is very simple, they just have to be fair, just have to give outs

Why most of the teams are not satisfy with umpire's decision?

because the decisons he gave was wrong, and neither am i satisfy

 Do you think that umpires should immediatly refer to third umpire if they are in a doubt?

ofc, if they think they missed out on something, then yeah the best thing to do is to refer to the 3rs U

Why the ICC doesn't take strict action against umpires?

because, we don't have tht many U, and prob because they think it's not big of a deal

Do you believe that steve buknor was favouring aussies in this test match series?If yes then state your reason

I think he was, becasue I found out that he is also form Aus. and prob he doesn't want his country to lose. Plus, i  also heard that they paid him

And  at the end i want to ask you that how deeply does this effect sportsmanship of players of any side?