Originally posted by: kabhi_21
Do you mean the advertisements shown and parts of earlier studio shows shown on TV were Live???? You dont need anyonw to answer your question here... just a general knowledge that the there was a little difference in the shooting of finale and screening on television😊
So it was not aired Live in India, either? I know in US we had things cut off and it was not very live at all even though there was a LIVE logo on the screen.
5 second, 30 second, 10 minute delay....these kinds of delays do happen, but they cannot account for the results being out in this case, because they were out before that. Are you saying there was that much more time lag? Why the bogus LIVE logo on the screen then...why all the advertising that megafinals would air live? Even if the voting is sacred as ever, this is pretty lame on Zee's part.
I don't remember this much confusion during C-2005, EMET, or Lil Champs. I think regardless of the issue of game fixing and whatnot, it seems that best case scenario is that somebody on the inside sold out the results to other news outlets for an extra buck.
I hope Zee restores the fun of the finale before this new season of Lil Champs announces its winner.
Can you tell me if judges had no clue of voting system how is ID accusing of rigged voting???
No I cannot, because I think we are getting into an issue of semantics. It seems to me that ID has raised allegations on at least two different levels. One is more along the lines that voting system was not structured and judges were not kept informed of what was going on. This is where the judges not having any clue about the voting system comes into play. On another level, ID is alleging foul play, due to the lack of transparency itself. From what I have seen and read of the interviews, ID seems pretty insistent that Raja got the most votes. I do not know if he is basing that assertion on any insider info, his understanding of the voting trends, a combination of both, or whether he is just shamelessly making it up. Only ID can answer these questions.
He answered that the result is done by public voting and not musical standards and its true that Aneek has got most votes.... and he gave example that debo got max votes even if it was widely believed that Vineet was better (ofcourse there were more better contestants who were eliminated before again based on voting)
Mr. Kaul's response of throwing one of Zee's own declared winner under the bus is still unprofessional.
As to the
rest, my understanding of ID's comments is that he is saying Raja
should have won, vote-wise. It seems to me the point about Amanat
being the best in ID's opinion is just there to emphasize his belief
that Zee's voting has failed double-over.
How did the person questioning know that going by number of votes raja was undoubtedly winner??? the question itself is biased and has faults.... Going by votes Aneek is undoubtedly the winner and hence live with it now😊
The question was ID's allegation. Why didn't Zee VP respond directly that Raja did not get the most votes?
He said that Zee did what Zee had to.... that was answer to the question... and I know debo went around in world Zee concerts, he even performed in Zee awards functions, his album was released.... what else you want... he was given manager too.... but no MD wants to work with him so is it Zee's problem????
I don't want anything. I would appreciate some modicum of professionalism from Zee in giving their answers. That is all. There was no need for Zee VP to get into Zee's own opinion on the merits of previous contestants. All they had to do was respond with what they have done for Debojit.
comment:
p_commentcount